The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.29.7.450

New procedures for conducting competency evaluations were adopted in Connecticut in 1975 as a result of a change In the state law. The accused person is now evaluated in the setting in which he finds himself by virtue of his conflict with the criminal fustice system, rather than automatically being remanded to the state hospital for evaluation. The criteria used are legal rather than medical-psychiatric, and the evaluations are conducted by a mental health team consisting of a psychiatric social worker, a psychiatrist, and a psycholo- gist. The authors describe the procedures and discuss the benefits deriving from them, as well as some of the real and potential problems.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.