The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.37.11.1136

A comprehensive cost comparison was made of resource utilization by seriously disabled chronic psychiatric patients randomly assigned to inpatient care and to an experimental residential program that provided an intermediate level of 24-hour care. At the end of the two-year study period, no significant changes in patients' clinical condition were observed, but costs for the experimental group averaged about $14,500 less (in 1981 dollars) than for the controls. The cost model included all treatment costs and nontreatment costs such as medical care, community services, case management, law enforcement and fire safety, maintenance outside the mental health system, and collateral costs. The study findings suggest that a program such as this one may be a viable alternative to back-ward long-term care for seriously disabled chronic patients.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.