Involuntary Admissions to General Hospitals: Legal Status Is Not the Issue
Abstract
Because of California state laws emphasizing treatment at the local level, and because of a number of financial considerations, many general hospitals in California have developed inpatient psychiatric programs designed to meet the needs of all but the most difficult-to-handle patients. Based on their experience in California, the authors argue that general hospitals should not reject involuntary psychiatric patients out of hand simply on the basis of legal status. They suggest instead that a distinction be made between cooperative, participating patients, regardless of legal status, and all other patients, and that appropriate programs be developed for each group. The patient's symptomatology and the resources available on the unit should be the determining factors in admission decisions, not legal status.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
