The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.31.1.33

In a study to determine the therapeutic value of ward policies of restriction and coercion, as in a step system of privileges, investigators compared the adjustments of patients in three ward settings: one with a formal step system, one in which the formal system had been abolished but a significant degree of restriction-coercion maintained, and one in which almost all activities and medications were optional. Patients' behaviors in seven areas were rated at admission, at discharge, and at one and six months after discharge. The patients on the ward with the formal step system showed better adjustment on 23 out of 35 ratings, although only one of the ratings was statistically significant. The slight therapeutic value of restriction-coercion suggested by these data contrasts with the results of an earlier, retrospective study. Cost-benefits involving economic, political, and therapeutic issues are raised.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.