The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20220602

Mental health peer support is a growing care modality; yet, understanding is limited regarding the ethical complexities that distinguish it from clinical mental health services. In particular, clinicians in mental health care do not navigate boundaries in the same way as peer workers, whose relationships with clients are notably different and may include interactions with clients outside designated support programs (“dual relationships”). Drawing on data from ongoing qualitative research, two researchers with lived experience of serious mental illness highlight the implications of dual relationships for both peer practice and research.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.