The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:

Objective:

The study examined whether education level was associated with benefits derived from a self-management intervention. Because such interventions increase one's sense of control, it was hypothesized that persons with less education, who generally have a diminished sense of control, would derive greater benefit.

Methods:

A randomized trial was conducted with 361 patients aged 60 and older with type 2 diabetes or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate depression. The intervention provided individualized contacts (two to ten) with nurses who taught participants to take control of their disease.

Results:

Positive effects on depression, health-related quality of life, feelings of mastery, and self-efficacy were confined to patients with more education; those with only a primary education did not benefit.

Conclusions:

Only more highly educated patients profited from a cognitive-behavioral approach to self-management. Patients with chronic conditions who have less education may derive greater benefits if environmental adversities or lower cognitive abilities are taken into account. (Psychiatric Services 62:793–795, 2011)