The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Effect of centralized intake on outcomes of substance abuse treatment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.47.11.1233

OBJECTIVE: State governments are exploring the potential of various forms of case management to control the costs of substance abuse treatment programs. This report describes an experimental program in one Iowa county in which clients are assessed and referred elsewhere if treatment is needed. Outcomes of clients in that county are compared with those of clients served elsewhere in the state. METHODS: All claims submitted by provider agencies to the Iowa Department of Public Health for substance abuse treatment of eligible clients in 1994 were analyzed to test the effect of the experimental intake-and-referral program on clients' utilization of outpatient treatment, rate of treatment completion, and rate of abstention at discharge from treatment. RESULTS: In the county with the experimental program, 27 percent of clients recommended for treatment actually attended, compared with 48 percent in other counties. Clients who used the experimental program were also less likely to complete treatment. These differences persisted after adjusting for baseline differences in client characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Lower utilization arising from failure to attend recommended treatment may reduce treatment costs but is not the intended outcome of the intake-and-referral program. Failure to complete treatment also is an adverse outcome. Outcomes of various types of case management programs should be carefully evaluated before statewide implementation is considered.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.