The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Suicide: the interaction of clinical and ethical issues

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.46.9.919

Although bioethical principles such as beneficence, nonmaleficence, and autonomy increasingly guide clinical decision making, in good clinical practice none of these principles is absolute. The authors describe how clinical and ethical issues interact in prioritizing principles in the treatment of suicidal patients. For the acutely suicidal patient, beneficence must be given primacy, as it should for the chronically suicidal patient who is unable to control self-destructive impulses. However, some chronically suicidal patients may be capable of resisting these impulses, and in such situations, respecting patients' autonomy facilitates clinical work and prevents the therapist from being drawn into a role that encourages regression. The successful management of the suicidal patient illustrates the need for dynamic, rather than rigid, application of ethical principles.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.