The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.39.5.533

In a university teaching hospital, the charts of 150 psychiatric inpatients consecutively referred for EEG were reviewed to survey the clinical use of the EEG by psychiatrists. Individual psychiatrists referred between 18 and 31 percent of their caseloads, and 11.3 percent of the EEGs were abnormal. The only dinical indications significantly associated with an abnormal EEG were a history of epilepsy and suspicion of a recent seizure, The presence of an organic factor, which was previously identified in the history, mental status examination, or physical examination of 58 percent of the patients, was significantly associated with an ab- normal EEG. However, none of the abnormal EEGs helped identify an organic etiology that was not already diagnosed, and in three cases clinicians appeared to ignore abnormal EEG results. Based on these data, the authors discourage the routine use of the EEG for psychiatric patients, rec- ommending that an EEG be considered only when the clinical history and findings suggest an underlying organic disorder.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.