The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.38.3.287

Executive directors of Oregon's 36 community mental health programs were surveyed in the fall of 1983 to determine the nature of psychiatric services offered and the roles played by psychiatrists. The study showed that a total of 18.2 full-time-equivalent psychiatrists were working in the community system, a mean of .5 per program, considerably below the national average. None of the responding directors were psychiatrists, and only six employed psychiatrists as medical directors. The directors valued psychiatrists most highly for their skills in educating, supervising, and consulting with staff; for their unique clinical skills; and for medication management. They considered the biggest disadvantage of employing psychiatrists to be the expense. The authors discuss factors that contribute to psychiatrists' satisfaction with work in community mental health programs and strategies for recruiting and retaining psychiatrists in the programs.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.