The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.37.4.376

The failure of research on longterm hospital treatment to show consistent relationships between length of stay and treatment outcome may reflect a need for more refined measures to evaluate long-term treatment. The authors developed an individualized method of assessing improvement in patients' major areas of impairment over the course of treatment. Using the new approach and two more traditional methods, the authors evaluated the outcome of 37 discharged long-term patients of a private psychiatric hospital who had been rated at admission and discharge on 21 variables related to ego function; affective symptoms; risk of suicide, self-destructiveness, and violence; substance abuse; level of treatment alliance; and, at discharge only, on overall level of improvement. Although the traditional methods failed to show a correlation between length of stay and most of the variables, the individualized approach found that a longer hospital stay was related to greater improvement in areas of most impaired functioning.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.