Outpatient Commitment: Treatment in the Least Restrictive Environment?
Abstract
Despite the growing emphasis on treatment in the least restrictive environment, states rarely use commitment to outpatient treatment as an alternative to involuntary hospitalization. The authors studied the effects of changes in North Carolina commitment laws that were made in 1979 and designed to facilitate the appropriate use of outpatient commitment. The changes resulted in some increase in the appropriate use of outpatient commitment; nevertheless, clinicians who work at hospitals and community treatment facilities con-tinue to doubt its efficacy. The authors discuss possible reasons f or the clinicians' reluctance to use outpatient commitment and attitudinal shifts needed on the part ofthe general public, professionals, and the judiciary if out patient commitment is to become a viable alternative.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
