The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.31.3.200

When a state hospital in New York began returning long-term psycbiatric patients to community living in Westchester County in 1974, the staff of the hospital, local community mental health providers, administrators of a private proprietary home for adults that received many of the patients, and local citizens worked to develop an integrated system of aftercare services. The local mental health council served as the umbrella group for the coordination of the various providers and consumers. The council's aftercare committee investigated several troubling aspects of the deinstitutionalization process including patient selection, the program and staffing of the home, transportation for residents, the physical structure of the home, and its licensing. The authors report the committee's findings and resolutions of some of the problems, and discuss some of the financial difficulties of residents in the home. While some problems remain, the authors feel that the council structure was a crucial element in facilitating a coordinated network of aftercare services.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.