The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202100619

Objective:

The authors aimed to evaluate the impact of a staff development training program informed by the collaborative recovery model (CRM) on staff outcomes in the largest implementation of CRM undertaken by a public clinical mental health service.

Methods:

Implementation spanned community, rehabilitation, inpatient, and crisis programs for children and youths, adults, and older persons in metropolitan Melbourne, 2017–2018. The CRM staff development program was cofacilitated and coproduced by trainers with clinical and lived experience of recovery (including caregivers) and delivered to the mental health workforce (N=729, including medical, nursing, allied health, lived experience, and leadership staff). The 3-day training program was supplemented by booster training and coaching in team-based reflective practice. Pre- and posttraining measures assessed changes in self-reported CRM-related knowledge, attitudes, skills, and confidence and in the perceived importance of CRM implementation. Staff definitions of recovery were analyzed to understand changes in language related to collaborative recovery.

Results:

The staff development program significantly (p<0.001) improved self-rated knowledge, attitudes, and skills in applying CRM. At booster training, improvements in attitudes and self-confidence in implementing CRM were maintained. Ratings of the importance of CRM and confidence in the organization’s implementation did not change. Definitions of recovery illustrated development of shared language throughout the large mental health program.

Conclusions:

The cofacilitated CRM staff development program achieved significant changes in staff knowledge, attitudes, skills, and confidence and changes in language related to recovery. These results suggest that implementing collaborative, recovery-oriented practice in a large public mental health program is feasible and can result in broad and sustainable change.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.