Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Back to table of contents
ArticlesFull Access

Mental Health Services and Personal Recovery in California: A Population-Based Analysis

Published Online:2 Mar 2020https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201900204

Abstract

Objective:

Personal recovery measures have been examined among treatment-seeking individuals enrolled in high-quality care. The authors examined whether utilization of mental health services as typically delivered is associated with personal recovery among adults with clinically significant psychological distress.

Methods:

The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-6) measured respondents’ (N=1,954) psychological distress level. The authors also assessed five dimensions of personal recovery—hope, life satisfaction, empowerment, connectedness, and internalized stigma. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to examine relationships between personal recovery and treatment, self-reported treatment completion, provider type, and adequacy of care, adjusting for covariates including K-6 score.

Results:

Participants who received care >12 months prior to the survey reported lower levels of hope (95% confidence interval [CI]=–0.36, –0.06, p<0.01), empowerment (95% CI=–0.26, –0.02, p<0.05), and connectedness (95% CI=–0.37, –0.06, p<0.01) than those who had not received treatment. Those who received care in the past 12 months reported lower levels of hope (95% CI=–0.47, –0.14, p<0.001) and life satisfaction (95% CI=−0.42, –0.05, p<0.01). However, treatment completion was associated with higher levels of empowerment (95% CI=0.02, 0.56, p<0.05) and hope (95% CI=0.04, 0.62, p<0.05) and lower levels of stigma (95% CI=−1.21, –0.21, p<0.01) compared with noncompletion. Differences according to provider type and adequacy of care were nonsignificant.

Conclusions:

Utilization of mental health services was associated with lower levels of personal recovery, which may indicate that care—as typically utilized and received—does not promote personal recovery. Longitudinal research is needed to determine causal relationships underlying these associations.