The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
LettersFull Access

Comparison of Social Workers' and Psychiatrists' GAF Ratings

To the Editor: I read with interest the article in the March issue assessing interdisciplinary reliability in the use of the DSM-IV Global Assessment of Functioning scale (1). The authors' conclusion is that with systematic training, social workers can provide reasonable assessments of a client's functioning. This conclusion is drawn from the results of the study, which showed a positive correlation between the GAF ratings that social workers and psychiatrists gave to discharged inpatients.

May I suggest three alternative conclusions? First, adequately trained psychiatrists can achieve the same level of competence as social workers. Second, trained by a psychologist, both social workers and psychiatrists can become competent in use of the GAF. Third, with similar training, interrater reliability among those using an instrument increases. Which conclusion is the most parsimonious?

Dr. Kopera is affiliated with the Community Counseling Centers of Chicago.

Reference

1. Harel TZ, Smith DW, Rowles JM: A comparison of psychiatrists' clinical-impression-based and social workers' computer-generated GAF scores. Psychiatric Services 53:340-342, 2002LinkGoogle Scholar