The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800565

Abstract

Objective:

Air pollution is a major environmental risk to health. Ambient (outdoor) air pollution in both cities and rural areas was estimated to cause 4.2 million premature deaths worldwide in 2016. In this review, the authors sought to briefly summarize original research investigating the short-term effects of air pollution exposure on mental health.

Methods:

A systematic search of the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted (from any time until March 4, 2019) to identify research studies reporting associations between daily levels of air pollutants and daily admissions to hospitals or emergency departments (EDs) for psychiatric disorders and symptoms. A final set of 19 articles was reviewed.

Results:

The results of all selected studies showed statistically significant associations between daily hospital admissions and ED visits for mental disorders and daily levels of some or all air pollutants considered, including particulate matter (PM) of variable sizes (in micrometers given in subscripts; PM2.5 and PM10), sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and ozone. The strongest and more consistent evidence across studies was found for PM2.5 and PM10.

Conclusions:

The results summarized in this review extend the evidence that air pollution may contribute either to worsening of psychiatric symptoms or to the decision to seek treatment for a large group of mental diseases and conditions, including severe psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Air pollution is a major environmental risk to health. This review summarizes evidence for associations between daily levels of air pollutants and daily hospital admissions for psychiatric care.

  • The 19 reviewed studies reported that daily hospital admissions and emergency department visits for mental disorders are significantly associated with daily levels of air pollutants, including small particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and ozone.

  • Air pollution may cause or exacerbate a large group of mental diseases and conditions, including severe psychiatric disorders.

Air pollution is well known to cause disease and is of significant public health concern in both developed and developing countries (1). In 2016, ambient (i.e., outdoor) air pollution in both cities and rural areas was estimated to cause 4.2 million premature deaths worldwide. In 2016, 91% of the global population was living in locations where the World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines levels were not observed. The WHO guidelines estimate health effects of air pollution and provide thresholds for pollution levels harmful to health. These guidelines are based on expert assessments of current scientific evidence for the health effects of particulate matter (PM) (PM10, diameter between >2.5 and 10 micrometers [μm]; PM2.5, ≤2.5 μm), nitrogen oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), and carbon monoxide (CO) in all WHO regions.

Air pollution affects health and increases the rates of morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. By reducing air pollution levels, countries can decrease the burden of disease from stroke, heart disease, lung cancer, and both chronic and acute respiratory diseases, including asthma. Evidence is now emerging that the aforementioned harmful compounds may reach all organs and even penetrate the blood-brain barrier. As a result, the central nervous system (CNS) may be affected in many ways, resulting in neuropathic inflammatory processes, activation of the immune system, oxidative stress, damage to blood vessels, and alterations in cerebral neurotransmitter concentrations, which can lead to mental or behavioral alterations (2, 3).

Air pollution is regarded as the largest single environmental risk to health, and interest in air pollution as a potential environmental risk factor for mental disorders has grown in recent years. However, in our opinion, research in this field remains insufficient. The aim of this review was to briefly summarize original research articles investigating the short-term effect of air pollution exposure on mental health. For this purpose, we chose to focus on articles analyzing associations between daily levels of air pollutant concentrations and daily hospital admissions (HAs) or emergency department (ED) visits for psychiatric disorders and symptoms.

Methods

A systematic search of the online databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (from any time until March 4, 2019) was independently conducted by two of the authors (F.B. and L.A.). Boolean search queries included the following terms: (“air pollution” or “air pollutants”) combined with (“mental health” or “psychiatry” or “psychiatric disorder” or “psychiatric disorders”) and (“hospitalization” or “admission” or “admissions” or “visit” or “visits”). We compiled publications that were original peer-reviewed articles, were published in any language, provided empirical data (as opposed to reviews or commentaries), and reported data on associations between daily air pollution levels and daily HAs or ED visits for mental disorders. The titles and abstracts of all identified citations were screened on the basis of the defined inclusion criteria. All references of included studies and those of any previous pertinent reviews were carefully reviewed to identify additional relevant studies. Consensus was then derived, resulting in a final set of publications to be reviewed and summarized. On the basis of the aforementioned search terms and criteria, 127 articles were initially identified (a PRISMA diagram is included in an online supplement to this article). From this list, we selected 19 original research reports as a final set of publications to be reviewed (2, 421). Two independent reviewers (F.B. and L.A.) abstracted data elements (sample characteristics, period considered, country, air pollutants considered, and main findings) and then jointly reached consensus about any discrepant abstracted information. Any articles published after the search date that became otherwise known to us were also included. Institutional review board approval was waived for this review article.

Results

Among the 19 studies of the association between daily air pollution levels and daily HAs or ED visits for mental disorders, all but three considered multiple air pollutants (Table 1). The pollutants considered in the studies were the following: NO2 (N=17 studies), SO2 (N=15), PM10 (N=16), O3 (N=13), CO (N=13), PM2.5 (N=12), NO (N=1), coefficient of haze (N=1), total oxidants (N=1), and total hydrocarbons (N=1). Most of the studies were conducted in China (N=7) and Canada (N=6) and the remainder in Korea (N=3), Italy (N=1), Sweden (N=1), and the United States (N=1). The selected studies analyzed the associations between air pollution levels and daily HAs or ED admissions for mental disorders in general (N=9) and for depression (N=5), schizophrenia (N=2), panic attacks (N=1), substance abuse (N=1), and suicide attempt or ideation (N=1). Characteristics and main findings of the reviewed articles are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1. Characteristics of the 19 reviewed studies

Pollutantc
StudyStudy periodCountrySample sizeType of admissionaAdmission reasonbPM2.5PM10CONO2O3SO2NO
Bai et al., 2019 (12)2014–2016China11,373HASCZ*
Bernardini et al., 2020 (10)2015–2016Italy1,860EDMDXXX*
Chen et al., 2018 (14)2013–2015China39,143HAMDX**XX*
Cho et al., 2015 (21)2005–2009Korea2,320EDPAXXX*X
Duan et al., 2018 (4)2014–2016China3,469HASCZ***
Gao et al., 2017 (8)2013–2015China13,291HAMD**XXXX
Kim et al., 2019 (11)2015–2016Korea67,561EDMD*XXXX
Lee et al., 2019 (2)2003–2013Korea80,634EDMD*XXXXX
Oudin et al., 2018 (7)2012–2016Sweden1,644EDMD*XX
Qiu et al., 2019 (20)2015–2016China10,947HAMD**XXXX
Song et al., 2018 (13)2014–2016China9,156HAMBD**
Strahilevitz et al., 1979 (9)1972United States149ED**X*
Szyszkowicz, 2007 (19)1992–2002Canada15,556EDD******
Szyszkowicz et al., 2009 (18)1992–2002Canada27,047EDDX***X*
Szyszkowicz et al., 2010 (17)1999–2003Canada1,605EDSAX***X*
Szyszkowicz, 2011 (16)1999–2002Canada404EDD*
Szyszkowicz et al., 2016 (15)2004–2011Canada118,602EDDXX*X
Szyszkowicz et al., 2018 (5)1992–2002Canada27,534EDSAD****XX
Wang et al., 2018 (6)2014–2015China19,646HAD**XXX
All studies1216131713151
N of studies finding significant association81367461

aED, emergency department; HA, hospital admission.

bD, depression; MBD, mental and behavioral disorder; MD, mental disorder; PA, panic attack; SA, suicide attempt; SAD, substance abuse disorder; SCZ, schizophrenia.

cX, the pollutant had no statistically significant effect; *, the pollutant had a statistically significant effect; CO, carbon monoxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; PM10, particulate matter (PM) between >2.5 and 10 μm in diameter; PM2.5, PM ≤2.5 μm in diameter; SO2, sulfur dioxide.

TABLE 1. Characteristics of the 19 reviewed studies

Enlarge table

The 19 studies we considered included different pollutants in their econometric frameworks and used different statistical identification strategies. Almost half of the 19 reviewed studies (N=9) analyzed associations between daily air pollution levels and ED visits and HAs for mental disorders in general and did not present data on specific mental disorder subtypes. However, the findings in all studies revealed significant associations between daily HAs and ED admissions for mental disorders and daily levels of some or all air pollutants. The strongest and more consistent evidence across studies was found for PM pollutants: 13 of the 16 studies that included PM10 in their analyses reported significant associations with daily HAs and ED admissions, as did eight of the 12 studies that included PM2.5. Some evidence was found for CO (in six of 13 studies including CO), NO2 (in seven of 17 studies), and SO2 (in six of 15 studies), whereas the evidence for O3 appeared somewhat weaker (four of 13 studies found a significant association of this pollutant with HAs and ED admissions).

Daily HAs and ED admissions for generic mental disorders were significantly associated with daily levels of PM10 (N=7 studies), PM2.5 (N=5), CO (N=2), NO2 (N=1), NO (N=1), O3 (N=1), and SO2 (N=1). Admissions for depression were examined in five studies and were associated with daily levels of PM10 (N=3 studies), SO2 (N=3), PM2.5 (N=2), CO (N=2), NO2 (N=2), and O3 (N=2). The two articles studying admissions for schizophrenia reported significant associations of these admissions with daily levels of NO2 (in both studies), PM10 (N=1), and SO2 (N=1). Another three studies analyzed the associations between pollutant levels and panic attacks (indicating association with O3), substance abuse disorders (associated with PM10, PM2.5, CO, and NO2), and suicide attempts (associated with PM10, CO, SO2, and NO2).

Table 2 presents details of each study by outcome of interest.

TABLE 2. Statistical significance and estimated magnitudes of the effects of air pollutants on admissions for mental health care among the 19 reviewed studies

StudyType of admissionaAdmission reasonbSignificance and magnitudecAdditional remarks
Bai et al., 2019 (12)HASCZNO2 was significant. The estimated RR per interquartile range (IQR) increase in NO2 at lag day 1 was 1.10 (95% CI=1.01–1.18). Greater association was observed among young patients (RR, 1.11; 95% CI=1.02–1.19).The modeled concentration-response curves of the NO2-schizophrenia relationship suggested possible threshold effects of NO2 for all ages combined, young patients, men, and both seasons.
Duan et al., 2018 (4)HASCZNO2, PM10, and SO2 were significant. NO2 and PM10 had short-term effects of 4 days and 3 days (NO2, lag 0–4, RR=1.84 [95% CI=1.49–2.27]; PM10, lag 0–3, RR=1.97 [95% CI=1.57–2.36]). SO2 had longer effects for 10 days (SO2, lag 0–10 RR, 2.93 [95% CI=2.10–4.10]).Different age groups were more sensitive to the onset of schizophrenia under the high NO2 exposure, such as patients ages 20–39 and 40–59 and male patients.
Szyszkowicz, 2007 (19)EDDCO, NO2, SO2, O3, PM2.5, and PM10 were significant. Increments in daily ED visits for D were 6.9% (95% CI=1.3%–12.9%) for CO for all patients in the warm season; 6.6% (95% CI=1.2%–12.4%) for NO2 in warm season; and 2.7% (95% CI=.4%–5.0%) for PM10 in all seasons.Effects were generally stronger for female patients. Increments in daily visits were also associated with other pollutants and seasons: 4.5% (95% CI=.1%–9.1%) for SO2 for female patients in warm season; 6.9% (95% CI=.6%–13.6%) for ground-level O3 1-day lagged for female patients in warm season; and 7.2% (95% CI=2.0%–12.8%) for PM2.5 for females in the cold season.
Szyszkowicz et al., 2009 (18)EDDCO, NO2, CO2, and PM10 were significant but only for specific seasons. The percentage increase in daily ED visits was 15.5% (95% CI=8.0%–23.5%) for CO per .8 ppm and 20.0% (95% CI=13.3%–27.2%) for NO2 per 20.1 ppb for same-day exposure during warm weather (April–September). For PM10, the largest increase, 7.2% (95% CI=3.0%–11.6%) per 19.4 ug/m3, was observed during cold weather (October–March).PM2.5 and O3 were not significant.
Szyszkowicz, 2011 (16)EDDSO2 significant for female patients ages ≥35. For female patients ages ≥35, OR=1.27 (95% CI=1.10–1.47) for same-day exposure.Figure 1 of the study shows that for most of the age subgroups, the 95% CIs were large and that any conclusion should be taken carefully. Also, SO2 was the only pollutant considered in the study.
Szyszkowicz et al., 2016 (15)EDDO3 was significant for both females and males at multiple lag times. According to the lag, ORs ranged between 1.01 (95% CI=.98–1.04) and 1.04 (95% CI=1.01–1.07) for males, and the OR was 1.03 (95% CI=1.00–1.05) for females.Increased SO2 was also associated with increased risk for females 7 days after exposure (OR=1.01, 95% CI=1.00–1.03). For males, exposure to PM2.5 was associated with increased risk 1 day after exposure (OR=1.01, 95% CI=1.00–1.03). NO2, PM2.5, and SO2 were not significant.
Wang et al., 2018 (6)HADPM2.5 and PM10 were significant. The strongest effect was observed on the day of exposure (lag day 0) for PM10, with an IQR increase in PM10 associated with a 3.55% (95% CI=1.69%–5.45%) increase in admissions for depression.Elderly patients were more sensitive to PM2.5, and patients with cardiovascular disease were more likely to be hospitalized after exposure to high levels of PM10, SO2, NO2, and CO pollutants, also included in the study but only as a control variable (typically not significant).
Bernardini et al., 2020 (10)EDMDO3 was significant. An increase of 1 µg/m3 of O3 concentration (relative to the average concentration of the past 20 days) resulted in .009 (95% CI=.005–.013) more hospital admissions.O3 was significant also when the analysis controlled for other pollutants (PM10, NO2, and CO, which were not significant).
Chen et al., 2018 (14)HAMDPM10, CO, and SO2 were significant. A 10-μg/m3 increase in 2-day, moving-average concentration of inhalable CO, PM, and SO2 was significantly associated with increments of .16% (95% CI=.02%–.30%), 1.27% (95% CI=.28%–2.26%), and 6.88% (95% CI=2.75%–11.00%), respectively, in daily hospital admissions for MD.The estimated association of SO2 was relatively robust to the adjustment of simultaneous exposure to other pollutants. The study found generally stronger associations of air pollutants with MD in warm seasons than in cool seasons. No significant differences in associations were noted between different sex and age groups.
Gao et al., 2017 (8)HAMDPM2.5 and PM10 were significant but only for female patients. A 10-μg/m3 increase in PM10 resulted in a .83% (95% CI=.15%–1.44%) increase in hospital admissions for mental disorders of female patients.Stronger associations were observed for schizophrenia and for patients ages <45; results for male patients were not significant. All other pollutants considered had no significant effects.
Kim et al., 2019 (11)EDMDPM2.5 was significant. The adjusted risk ratio (ARR) in the model adjusted for SO2 was 1.01 (95% CI=1.00–1.02) for 10 μg/m3 of PM2.5 on lag day 1 for all psychiatric diseases (ICD-10-CM codes F00–F99). The ARR in the model adjusted for O3 was 1.02 (95% CI=1.00–1.03) for 10 μg/m3 of PM2.5 on lag day 1 for codes F40–F49 (neurotic, stress-related, and somatoform disorders).Other pollutants considered (SO2, CO, O3, and NO2) had no significant effects.
Lee et al., 2019 (2)EDMDPM2.5 was significant. The RR of emergency admissions for mental illness was 1.01 (95% CI=1.00–1.02) for each 10-μg/m3 increase in 2-day average PM2.5 concentration.The effect became stronger when the analysis controlled for other pollutants (which were not significant), but the association appeared to be limited to individuals ages <65 and only during the warm season.
Oudin et al., 2018 (7)EDMDPM10 was significant in the warmer season. A 10-μg/m3 increase in PM10 was associated with a 3.6% (95% CI=.4%–7.0%) increase in hospital visits in the warmer season.The results were confirmed in a three-pollutant model. O3 and NO2 were not significant.
Qiu et al., 2019 (20)HAMDPM2.5 and PM10 were significant. Each 10-μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and PM10 corresponded to an increase of 2.89% (95% CI=.75%–5.08%), 1.91% (95% CI=.57%–3.28%), and 3.95% (95% CI=.84%–7.15%) in daily HAs for MD.The risk estimates of PM on MD hospitalizations were generally robust after adjustment for gaseous pollutants in two-pollutant models. Stronger associations were noted for male patients and in warm seasons.
Strahilevitz et al., 1979 (9)EDMDCO, NO2, and NO were significant. The study estimated only simple correlations between pollutants and ED visits.
Cho et al., 2015 (21)EDPAO3 was significant. The RR of PA–related ED visits was 1.05 (95% CI=1.01–1.09) for same-day exposure to O3. In cumulative models, adjusted RRs were 1.07 (95% CI=1.03–1.11) for lag days 0–2 and 1.07 (95% CI=1.04–1.11) for lag days 0–3.Other pollutants (SO2, PM10, NO2, and CO) were not significant. More significant results were found for younger patients (ages <40 years), for women, and during warm seasons.
Song et al., 2018 (13)HAMBDPM2.5, and PM10 were significant. A 10-μg/m3 increase in a 3-day average concentration (lag day 2) of PM2.5 and PM10 corresponded to an increase of .48% (95% CI=.18%–.79%) and .32% (95% CI=.03%–.62%), respectively, in daily HAs for MBD.Stronger associations were found for male patients and for older individuals (ages >45 years).
Szyszkowicz et al., 2010 (17)EDSAPM10, CO, NO2, and SO2 were significant. The RR corresponding to an increase in one interquintile range of CO was 9.6% (95% CI=.9%–19.2%); of NO2, 11.2% (95% CI=.6%–22.8%); of SO2, 10.9% (95% CI=1.3%–21.5%); and of PM10, 13.2% (95% CI=1.9%–25.8%).The largest increase was observed for males in the cold period for a 1-day lagged exposure to NO2, with an excess risk of 23.9% (95% CI=7.8%–42.4%) and OR of 1.21 (95% CI=1.03–1.41). In warm months, the associations were not statistically significant, and the highest positive value was obtained for O3 lagged by 1 day.
Szyszkowicz et al., 2018 (5)EDSADPM10, CO, and NO2 were significant overall, and PM2.5 was significant only in the cold season. The OR for CO at lag day 1 was 1.02 (95% CI=1.01–1.04); for NO2 at lag day 6, 1.04 (95% CI=1.01–1.06); and for PM10 at lag day 2, 1.02 (95% CI=1.00–1.04).The strongest associations were obtained in the cold period (October–March) for 1-day lagged CO (OR=1.03, 95% CI=1.01–1.05, IQR=.4 ppm) and NO2 (OR=1.04, 95% CI=1.01–1.07, IQR=12.8 ppb). ORs were also significant for CO and NO2, with lags of 2 to 6 days and 2 to 7 days, respectively.

aED, emergency department; HA, hospital admission.

bD, depression; MBD, mental and behavioral disorder; MD, mental disorder; PA, panic attack; SA, suicide attempt; SAD, substance abuse disorder; SCZ, schizophrenia.

cCO, carbon monoxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; PM10, particulate matter (PM) between >2.5 and 10 μm in diameter; PM2.5, PM ≤2.5 μm in diameter; RR, relative risk; SO2, sulfur dioxide. Lag refers to days between recording of the pollutant concentration and HAs or ED visits.

TABLE 2. Statistical significance and estimated magnitudes of the effects of air pollutants on admissions for mental health care among the 19 reviewed studies

Enlarge table

Discussion

In this article, we reviewed the literature investigating associations between elevated daily levels of air pollution with psychiatric ED visits and HAs. The potential role of air pollutants in the etiology of CNS disorders is receiving considerable attention (1). The outcome considered in the studies we reviewed was the daily number of HAs and ED admissions for generic or specific mental disorders, a broad marker of worsening mental health. Because almost half of the reviewed studies did not present data on the association between ED visits and HAs for specific mental disorder subtypes and daily air pollution levels, we could not conduct a comprehensive analysis of the impact of air pollution exposure on HAs or ED visits for specific diagnoses or symptoms subgroups.

Although the pollutants examined, the psychiatric conditions studied, and study period investigated were variable among the studies, the results suggest that air pollution is associated with a wide range of psychiatric disorders in the short term. The studies found significant associations between daily HAs and ED admissions for mental disorders and daily levels of various air pollutants, with greater evidence for an association of PMs (PM10 in particular) with these disorders. The results of the reviewed studies varied with respect to which pollutant had the strongest impact on daily admissions; demographic characteristics of participants, such as age and sex; patterns of seasonality (i.e., associations with pollutants year-round or only in the cold or warm seasons); and study period. Differences across the studies’ findings may be attributed to differences in study designs, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample populations, air pollutant mixtures, and the diagnostic criteria used. Moreover, because statistical significance is determined in part by sample size, statistical significance to quantify the relative strengths of associations approximates the real effects of air pollutants only partially. In this regard, several cross-validations enlarging the sample size and using alternative statistical techniques would be needed.

Nevertheless, during the past decade, a consistent body of evidence has revealed the potentially harmful effects of inhaled air pollutants on the CNS (22), indicating that air pollutants might particularly target cerebral white matter, cortical gray matter, and basal ganglia (23). Although the physiopathological mechanisms remain unclear, the association between daily air pollution levels and daily HAs and ED visits for mental disorders may be somewhat biologically plausible. A 2017 literature review of air pollution as a risk factor for psychotic disorders indicated that exposure to xenobiotic heavy metals, such as lead and cadmium; constituents of air pollution, such as PM, nitrogen and sulfur oxides, and organic solvents; and other environmental pollutants could be component causes for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders (24). Urbanicity (being born or raised in cities) has been commonly described as an environmental factor associated with increased risk for schizophrenia and other nonaffective psychoses, so air pollution exposure may mediate this association, at least in part (25).

The results summarized in this review extend the evidence that air pollution may cause or exacerbate a large group of mental diseases and conditions, including severe psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and depression. If air pollution is an independent risk factor for mental health conditions, policy measures should be developed and expanded to address air pollution, which also increases risk for several other diseases. Regulatory interventions are needed to reduce environmental pollution levels and their negative effects on health.

Studies that analyze the associations of daily levels of pollutants with HAs and ED visits for mental disorders have become feasible because data about admissions are often readily available from hospital registers, and measures of air pollutants are increasingly used worldwide. Nevertheless, this approach presents important limitations, which warrant further discussion. The ecological nature of time series–based analysis can capture only acute effects of air pollution levels on the increase of HAs for mental disorders and may make it difficult to assess personal factors related to air pollution exposure. For instance, the reviewed studies took into account only outdoor pollution levels by using measurements from fixed-site monitor stations as a proxy for the pollution exposure of the population, which may not fully reflect personal exposure, because pollution exposure also may occur in other settings, such as workplaces and homes. For example, domestic wood smoke, as well as indoor cooking, may have health effects similar to those of particles stemming from automobile traffic and should be taken into account as an additional risk factor for mental health conditions (26). Seasonal and individual features (e.g., sex and age) might also modulate the health effects of air pollutant levels (27). The reviewed studies reported that various pollutants have different effects on different mental conditions, with different lag times. Also, the results of the reviewed studies indicated different effects on distinct subpopulations, with inconsistent results regarding which sex and age groups are more affected. Because each pollutant may operate through different pathways and mechanisms and may have different effects on the CNS, future studies should focus on the exact mechanisms underlying the effects of different pollutants on increased HAs for mental disorders. They should also explore the delayed effects of air pollution on mental health among different subpopulations, taking into consideration data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including medical diagnosis and reason for admission.

Conclusions

The results summarized in this review extend existing evidence indicating that air pollution may contribute either to worsening of psychiatric symptoms or to seek treatment for a large group of mental diseases and conditions, including severe psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. Future research in this field is strongly encouraged to increase statistical power of the available data and the generalizability of the results discussed here. One focus of this future research will likely be on the neurotoxic components of air and on environmental pollutants, revealing their pathological mechanisms on the CNS and investigating the effects of specific pollution components on the risks for mental illness and neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases. A large research program requiring collaboration among researchers and scientists from different fields appears to be required to understand this important human health issue (22).

Servizio Psichiatrico di Diagnosi e Cura (S.P.D.C.) Pordenone, Department of Mental Health, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, Pordenone, Italy (Bernardini); Planetary Health Lab, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (Bernardini, Attademo); European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (Trezzi); Section of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy (Quartesan); S.P.D.C. Potenza, Department of Mental Health, A.S.P. Basilicata, Potenza, Italy (Attademo).
Send correspondence to Dr. Bernardini ().

Prof. Quartesan died on April 20, 2019. The other authors are very grateful for his teachings and for the support, assistance, and encouragement he provided for this and other work over past years.

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

The authors thank all health care workers and members of the scientific community involved in the fight against COVID-19 worldwide.

References

1 Ambient (Outdoor) Air Pollution. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2018. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-healthGoogle Scholar

2 Lee S, Lee W, Kim D, et al.: Short-term PM2.5 exposure and emergency hospital admissions for mental disease. Environ Res 2019; 171:313–320Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Gładka A, Rymaszewska J, Zatoński T: Impact of air pollution on depression and suicide. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018; 31:711–721MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Duan J, Cheng Q, Luo X, et al.: Is the serious ambient air pollution associated with increased admissions for schizophrenia? Sci Total Environ 2018; 644:14–19Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Szyszkowicz M, Thomson EM, Colman I, et al.: Ambient air pollution exposure and emergency department visits for substance abuse. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0199826Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Wang F, Liu H, Li H, et al.: Ambient concentrations of particulate matter and hospitalization for depression in 26 Chinese cities: a case-crossover study. Environ Int 2018; 114:115–122Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Oudin A, Åström DO, Asplund P, et al.: The association between daily concentrations of air pollution and visits to a psychiatric emergency unit: a case-crossover study. Environ Health 2018; 17:4Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Gao Q, Xu Q, Guo X, et al.: Particulate matter air pollution associated with hospital admissions for mental disorders: a time-series study in Beijing, China. Eur Psychiatry 2017; 44:68–75Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Strahilevitz M, Strahilevitz A, Miller JE: Air pollutants and the admission rate of psychiatric patients. Am J Psychiatry 1979; 136:205–207LinkGoogle Scholar

10 Bernardini F, Attademo L, Trezzi R, et al.: Air pollutants and daily number of admissions to psychiatric emergency services: evidence for detrimental mental health effects of ozone. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2020; 29:e66CrossrefGoogle Scholar

11 Kim SH, Shin SD, Song KJ, et al.: Association between ambient PM2.5 and emergency department visits for psychiatric emergency diseases. Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37:1649–1656Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Bai L, Zhang X, Zhang Y, et al.: Ambient concentrations of NO2 and hospital admissions for schizophrenia. Occup Environ Med 2019; 76:125–131Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Song J, Zheng L, Lu M, et al.: Acute effects of ambient particulate matter pollution on hospital admissions for mental and behavioral disorders: a time-series study in Shijiazhuang, China. Sci Total Environ 2018; 636:205–211Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14 Chen C, Liu C, Chen R, et al.: Ambient air pollution and daily hospital admissions for mental disorders in Shanghai, China. Sci Total Environ 2018; 613-614:324–330Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15 Szyszkowicz M, Kousha T, Kingsbury M, et al.: Air pollution and emergency department visits for depression: a multicity case-crossover study. Environ Health Insights 2016; 10:155–161Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16 Szyszkowicz M: Ambient sulfur dioxide and female ED visits for depression. Air Qual Atmos Health 2011; 4:259–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar

17 Szyszkowicz M, Willey JB, Grafstein E, et al.: Air pollution and emergency department visits for suicide attempts in Vancouver, Canada. Environ Health Insights 2010; 4:79–86Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

18 Szyszkowicz M, Rowe BH, Colman I: Air pollution and daily emergency department visits for depression. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2009; 22:355–362Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

19 Szyszkowicz M: Air pollution and emergency department visits for depression in Edmonton, Canada. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2007; 20:241–245MedlineGoogle Scholar

20 Qiu H, Zhu X, Wang L, et al.: Attributable risk of hospital admissions for overall and specific mental disorders due to particulate matter pollution: a time-series study in Chengdu, China. Environ Res 2019; 170:230–237Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

21 Cho J, Choi YJ, Sohn J, et al.: Ambient ozone concentration and emergency department visits for panic attacks. J Psychiatr Res 2015; 62:130–135Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

22 Block ML, Elder A, Auten RL, et al.: The outdoor air pollution and brain health workshop. Neurotoxicology 2012; 33:972–984Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

23 de Prado Bert P, Mercader EMH, Pujol J, et al.: The effects of air pollution on the brain: a review of studies interfacing environmental epidemiology and neuroimaging. Curr Environ Health Rep 2018; 5:351–364Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

24 Attademo L, Bernardini F, Garinella R, et al.: Environmental pollution and risk of psychotic disorders: a review of the science to date. Schizophr Res 2017; 181:55–59Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

25 Attademo L, Bernardini F: Air pollution and urbanicity: common risk factors for dementia and schizophrenia? Lancet Planet Health 2017; 1:e90–e91Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

26 Oudin A, Segersson D, Adolfsson R, et al.: Association between air pollution from residential wood burning and dementia incidence in a longitudinal study in Northern Sweden. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0198283Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

27 Tong L, Li K, Zhou Q: Season, sex and age as modifiers in the association of psychosis morbidity with air pollutants: a rising problem in a Chinese metropolis. Sci Total Environ 2016; 541:928–933Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar