The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Abstract

Objectives:

This study identified variables associated with perceived partially met and unmet needs for information, medication, and counseling, as well as overall perceived unmet needs, related to mental health among 571 people in a Canadian epidemiologic catchment area.

Methods:

Needs were measured with the Perceived Need for Care Questionnaire and a comprehensive set of independent variables based on Andersen’s behavioral model. Four models were constructed for the following dependent variables: perceived unmet needs for information, medication, and counseling (multinomial logistic regression) and overall perceived unmet needs (multiple logistic regression).

Results:

The proportions reporting fully unmet need were as follows: counseling, 30%; information, 18%; and medication, 4%. Variables associated with unmet needs for information, medication, and counseling were quite distinct. Enabling factors (for example, neighborhood perception variables) were strongly associated with perceived unmet need for information. Need factors were more strongly associated with unmet need for medication, predisposing factors with unmet needs for information and medication, and health service use with unmet information and counseling needs. People whose overall needs went unmet tended to be younger, to have an addiction, and to have consulted fewer professionals.

Conclusions:

Mental health services should facilitate access to psychologists or other clinicians to better meet counseling and information needs. They should also take neighborhoods into account when assessing needs and provide more information about mental disorders and the treatments and services offered in disadvantaged areas. Finally, services should be further developed for younger people with addiction, who tend to be stigmatized and avoid using health services.

According to the 2012 Canadian Mental Health Survey, 10% of the Canadian population age 15 and over had experienced at least one mental disorder in the previous 12 months (1). It is acknowledged that only a minority of people with mental disorders (33%−46%) seek help from a health care professional (2,3) and that perceived need is a significant predictor of mental health service use (4,5). In epidemiologic studies, participants may perceive needs primarily for information (about mental disorders, treatments, or services), medication, and counseling (including psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy). A need is considered to be fully met when a person receives help meeting all his or her expectations. In other cases, the help may only partly fulfill the need, or no support is provided at all and the need is unmet (1).

According to previous studies, people diagnosed as having a mental disorder, especially depression (68), panic disorder (9) and other anxiety disorders (8), or a co-occurring mental disorder and addiction (6), perceive more unmet needs than people without these diagnoses. A high level of psychological distress (1,6,10) and absence of chronic general medical illnesses (1) are other clinical variables correlated with perceived unmet needs. These variables are also strongly associated with mental health service use (1113). The findings related to sociodemographic variables are inconsistent: studies have shown that the people most likely to have perceived unmet needs are younger (1416) or older (7) and have lower (4) or higher (10) levels of education. In regard to socioeconomic variables, unmet needs are associated with being unemployed (17), having no insurance coverage (14,18), and having little social support (15,17). A negative association has also been found between quality of life and perceived unmet needs (1924) among individuals with severe mental disorders.

To our knowledge, no study based on a conceptual framework that includes several categories of variables has analyzed perceived unmet needs in a catchment area. In studies of health service use, Andersen’s behavioral model is widely used (5). This model explains health service use in terms of predisposing, enabling, and need factors. Predisposing factors include individual characteristics, such as age, gender, civil status, and self-perceived health. Enabling factors, such as income, social support and neighborhood, also influence health service use. Finally, need factors refer to clinical variables, such as number and type of disorders (5). Many variables reported as being associated with health service use according to Andersen’s behavioral model, such as self-perceived mental (25) or general medical health (26) and spirituality (27), have rarely been analyzed in studies of perceived unmet needs. To our knowledge, other variables, such as stress, aggressive behavior, and perception of the quality or safety of the neighborhood, have received no attention from researchers. People experiencing several stressful events or perceiving their neighborhoods as disadvantaged, unsafe, or hostile may be more likely to perceive unmet needs. Furthermore, people with aggressive behavior may have more trouble accessing services and may therefore be more likely to view their needs as unmet.

Several studies have described the proportion of unmet needs for information, medication, and counseling (2832). However, as far as can be ascertained, only one has analyzed variables associated with unmet needs in each of those domains (1). Sunderland and Findlay (1) found that people with mental disorders, with greater psychological distress, and without chronic general medical conditions are more likely to have perceived unmet needs overall and mainly for counseling. However, only a limited number of clinical variables were considered. Greater knowledge about variables associated with perceived unmet needs would help identify people who fail to obtain the required care. Considering that mental disorders have biopsychosocial causes and that treatment should not be limited to medication but should also cover psychosocial aspects (33), perceived unmet needs for information, counseling, and medication may be mainly associated with distinct variables.

This study had two objectives: to compare variables associated with perceived partially met and unmet information, medication, and counseling needs among 571 people residing in a Canadian epidemiologic catchment area and to identify variables associated with overall perceived unmet needs. On the basis of Andersen’s behavioral model and on the literature on needs and on health service use, it was hypothesized that perceived unmet need for information is negatively associated with social support, neighborhood perception (enabling factors), and health service use variables; that unmet need for counseling is more highly associated with socioeconomic variables (enabling factors), compared with unmet need for medication, which in turn is more likely to be associated with diagnoses (need factors); and that overall perceived unmet needs are mainly associated with need factors and negatively associated with health service use variables.

Methods

Design, Setting, and Survey Sample

This research stemmed from the third wave (T3) (January 2012 to July 2013) of a longitudinal study carried out in an epidemiologic catchment area in Montreal, the second largest city in Canada. The catchment area, with a population of 269,720, includes four neighborhoods, with populations ranging from 29,680 to 72,420 inhabitants. Further details about the catchment area have been published elsewhere (24,34).

The sample was equally distributed among the four neighborhoods. The data were weighted by gender and age at T1 (June 2007 to December 2008) to obtain precise information about mental disorders in the population. Participants provided written informed consent to take part in the study. The ethics board from a psychiatric hospital approved the research. The retention rate at T3 was 72%, which is quite similar to that of other epidemiological studies (69% to 76% after two to five years [35,36]). [Further details about the catchment area and about the sample are available in an online supplement to this article.]

Variables and Instruments

The dependent variable—perceived unmet needs—was measured using the Perceived Need for Care Questionnaire (PNCQ) (37). The PNCQ assesses perceived needs (for information, counseling, medication, social intervention, and skills training) in the previous 12 months. It has good reliability (κ=.60 for interrater reliability) (37). On the basis of Andersen’s behavioral model (30), the independent variables were grouped under predisposing, enabling, and need factors and service use variables (Figure 1). [The 18 measurement instruments used are described in detail in the online supplement.]

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1. Conceptual framework of variables related to perceived unmet need for information, medication, and counseling and overall needsa

aExcept for sociodemographic variables, variables were measured in the previous 12 months.

Analyses

Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were conducted. Univariate analyses produced a frequency distribution for categorical variables and mean values, along with a standard deviation for continuous variables. Four models were developed in relation to the four dependent variables: perceived unmet need for information need, perceived unmet need for medication, perceived unmet need for counseling, and overall perceived unmet needs (including needs for social intervention and skills training). The first three models used multinomial logistic regression, and the fourth used multiple logistic regression. The models were developed around the variables shown in Figure 1, following bivariate analyses. Variables with a significant association with each dependent variable, for an alpha value set to p=.10, were entered into the model by using a backward-elimination approach. For all models, alpha values were set at p=.05. Goodness of fit and total explained variance were calculated for each model.

Results

Of the 2,334 persons interviewed, 571 (24%) expressed a need for information, medication, or counseling in relation to mental health, and these participants were selected for further analysis. Of them, 467 (82%) said that their needs were fully or partially met, while 104 (18%) reported that all their needs were unmet. Table 1 presents data on the participant characteristics.

TABLE 1. Characteristics of 571 survey respondents who perceived a need related to mental health care

CharacteristicAll needs met
Total sampleInformation (N=213)Medication (N=257)Counseling (N=239)No needs met (N=104)
N%N%N%N%N%
Predisposing factor
 Sociodemographic
  Age (M±SD)42.6±13.441±1346±1343±1339±13
  Gender
   Female386681376417267168707067
   Male185327636853371303433
 Spirituality
  Not important235418640943794395149
  Important336591276016363145615351
 Quality of life score (M±SD)a101.6±16.0101±15100±16102±16101±15
 Perceptions of health
  Self-perception of general medical health
   Poor or fair2233981381134481344038
   Good201351334153413391539
   Very good or excellent1472610287221128923
  Self-perception of mental health
   Poor or fair239421346114912421042
   Good198351532163213321843
   Very good or excellent13424723620826614
Enabling factor
 Neighborhood perception score (M±SD)
  Perceived neighborhood physical conditionb44.6±11.046±1045±1144±1145±11
  Informal social controlc17.1±4.017±417±417±417±4
  Sense of collective efficacyc34.4±7.034±734±735±734±7
  Neighborly behaviord15.2±10.016±1015±1015±1015±10
Need factor
 Aggression
  Verbal aggression317561175512649127536865
  Aggression against property167296631471871303938
 Stressful events score (M±SD)e3.9±2.04±34±24±24±2
 Clinical variable
  Mental disorder
   Major depressive episode117215325642555232221
   Mania23410512510444
   General anxiety disorder1126342830
   Panic disorder24410516614622
   Social phobia34617817716777
   Agoraphobia12263625211
   Alcohol dependence244525211599
   Drug dependence2541269410466
   Any addiction (drug or alcohol)4271571351771313
   Posttraumatic stress disorder45824113012251044
 Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (M±SD)f
  Entire sample2.4±5.02±53±63±63±6
  Participants with cognitive disorders14.3±2.014.5±2.014.2±2.014.2±2.014.7±2.0
 Any mental disorder133236028692663262423
 Psychological distress score (M±SD)g11.9±7.012±713±712±712±6
Health service use
 Has a family doctor 401701617619977179755149
 N of health professionals consulted in past year (M±SD)2.6±2.03±23±23±21±1

aAs measured by the Satisfaction With Life Domain Scale. Possible scores range from 20 to 140, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.

bAs measured by the Neighborhood Physical Conditions Scale. Possible scores range from 10 to 70, with higher scores indicating more positive neighborhood physical conditions.

cAs measured by the Sense of Collective Scale. Possible scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating lower social control or collective efficacy.

dAs measured by the Neighborhood Behavior Scale. Possible scores range from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating more positive neighborhood behavior.

eAs measured by the Questionnaire on Life Events. Possible scores range from 0 to 22, with higher scores indicating a greater number of stressful events.

fPossible scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher cognitive dysfunction.

gAs measured by the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Possible scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.

TABLE 1. Characteristics of 571 survey respondents who perceived a need related to mental health care

Enlarge table

The largest proportion of the 571 participants perceived a need for counseling (70%, N=397), followed by information (49%, N=279) and medication (49%, N=279). The proportion of participants perceiving a fully met need, a partially met need, and an unmet need, respectively, was 60% (N=239), 10% (N=38), and 30% (N=120) for counseling; 76% (N=213), 6% (N=16), and 18% (N=50) for information; and 92% (N=257), 4% (N=12), and 4% (N=10) for medication. Finally, of the 180 perceived unmet needs reported by the 571 persons, 67% (N=120) were for counseling, 28% (N=50) for information, and only 6% (N=10) for medication.

Table 2 presents the independent variables associated with perceived partially met and unmet needs for information, medication, and counseling. Compared with participants with a fully met need for information, those with a partially met need were more likely to be female (88% versus 64%), to perceive their mental health as poor (predisposing factors), to be more positive about the physical conditions of their neighborhood and their sense of collective efficacy, and to be less positive about the neighborly behaviors (for example, lending a neighbor a tool or taking care of an out-of-town neighbor’s house) and their capacity for informal social control (enabling factors). Compared with participants with a fully met need for information, those with a perceived unmet need were more likely to commit aggression against property (need factor), to be less positive about neighborly behavior and their capacity for informal social control (enabling factors), and to have seen fewer health care professionals (health service use variable). This model explained 33% of the total variance associated with perceived unmet need for information.

TABLE 2. Variables independently associated with unmet needs for information, medication, and counseling among survey respondents perceiving a needa

Type of need and variablePartially met needsAll needs unmet
BpOR95% CIBpOR95% CI
For informationb
 Predisposing factor
  Gender–1.96.02.14.03–.71–.60.12.55.26–1.17
  Self-perception of mental health–1.21.00.30.14–.65–.32.10.73.50–1.06
 Enabling factor
  Perceived neighborhood physical conditions.09.011.091.02–1.17–.02.36.98.95–1.02
  Informal social control score.33.061.38.98–1.95.20.061.23.99–1.51
  Sense of collective efficacy score–.25.02.78.63–.96–.06.32.94.83–1.06
  Neighborly behavior score–.10.05.91.83–1.00–.06.01.94.90–.98
 Need factor
  Aggression against property–.36.68.70.13–3.821.21.023.361.21–9.35
 Health service use
  N of health professionals consulted.06.681.06.79–1.42–.63<.01.53.42–.69
For medicationc
 Predisposing factor
  Importance attributed to spirituality–.38.57.69.18–2.57–1.71.03.18.04–.81
  Self-perception of general medical health–.75.04.48.24–.95.28.411.33.68–2.61
 Enabling factor
  Perceived safety score–.39.13.68.41–1.12.42.081.52.95–2.44
 Need factor
  Aggression against property1.50.024.491.23–16.42.33.671.39.30–6.44
  Stressful events score.16.191.17.92–1.50.26.021.301.05–1.61
For counselingd
 Predisposing factor
  Self-perception of mental health–.68.07.51.25–1.05–.34.14.71.46–1.11
 Enabling factor
  Informal social control.03.651.03.90–1.19.12.021.131.02–1.25
 Need factor
  Verbal aggression.65.311.91.55–6.62.90.052.451.01–5.94
 Health service use
  N of health professionals consulted.09.551.10.81–1.48–.64<.01.53.40–.70

aMultinomial logistic regression models. The reference group in each model is no unmet needs.

bA total of 279 respondents reported a need for information. Model statistics: Nagelkerke R2=33.1%; McFadden R2=2.8%; goodness of fit Pearson χ2=78.57, df=16, p<.001

cA total of 279 respondents reported a need for medication. Model statistics: Nagelkerke R2=24.6%; McFadden R2=19.1%; goodness of fit Pearson χ2=35.28, df=10, p<.001

dA total of 379 respondents reported a need for counseling. Model statistics: Nagelkerke R2=26.6%; McFadden R2=15.9%; goodness of fit Pearson χ2=45.364, df=8, p<.001

TABLE 2. Variables independently associated with unmet needs for information, medication, and counseling among survey respondents perceiving a needa

Enlarge table

Compared with participants with a fully met need for medication, those with a partially met need were more likely to perceive their general medical health as poor (predisposing factor) and to commit aggression against property (need factor). People with a totally unmet need for medication were more likely than those whose need was fully met to give no importance to spirituality (predisposing factor), to perceive their neighborhoods as unsafe (enabling factor), and to have experienced a greater number of stressful events (need factor). This model explained 25% of the total variance associated with perceived unmet need for medication.

Compared with participants with a fully met need for counseling, those with a partially met need had poorer self-perceived mental health (predisposing factor), whereas those with a totally unmet need for counseling were more likely to exercise a lower level of informal social control (enabling factor), to show verbal aggression (need factor), and to see fewer health care professionals (health service use variable). This model explained 27% of the total variance associated with perceived unmet need for counseling.

Variables associated with overall perceived unmet needs were female gender and younger age (predisposing factors); a higher score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (indicating cognitive dysfunction), addiction, and verbal aggression (need factors); and having seen fewer health care professionals (health service use variable) (Table 3). This model had an acceptable goodness of fit and explained 30% of the total variance associated with overall perceived unmet needs.

TABLE 3. Variables independently associated with overall unmet needs among survey respondents perceiving a needa

Factor type and variableBpOR95% CI
Predisposing factor
 Male–.55.04.58.34–.98
 Age–.03<.01.97.95–.99
Need factor
 Verbal aggression.46.071.58.96–2.61
 Addiction1.26<.013.521.48–8.36
 Montreal Cognitive Assessment score.05.031.061.00–1.11
Health service use
 N of health professionals consulted–.87<.01.42.34–.52

aMultiple logistic regression model. The reference group is the combined groups of those with partially met needs and those with no unmet needs. Model statistics: Nagelkerke R2=29.9%; Cox and Snell R2=18.3%; goodness of fit Hosmer-Lemeshow test, R2=11.14, df=8, p<.194; overall percentage of correctly classified observations, 84.1%

TABLE 3. Variables independently associated with overall unmet needs among survey respondents perceiving a needa

Enlarge table

Discussion

The proportion of participants expressing needs in our study (24%) was somewhat higher than the proportions (14% to 23%) estimated in previous epidemiological studies that used the PNCQ (4,28,29,31). These differences may be explained by the demographic structure of the setting (poverty and high prevalence of psychological distress) or by the presence of a psychiatric hospital in the catchment area. However, the proportions of the sample reporting fully met needs for medication (92%), information (76%), and counseling (60%) were quite similar to estimates in the 2012 Canadian Mental Health Survey (91%, 70%, and 65%, respectively) (1).

As in previous studies, perceived unmet and partially met needs were more common for counseling, followed by information (1,2830,32). The high proportion of the perceived unmet need for counseling suggests that people with common mental disorders (depression and anxiety disorders) would prefer to receive both medication and psychotherapy or to have better access to psychologists (38). An unmet need for counseling cannot be explained by a lack of psychologists, because the ratio of 104 psychologists to 100,000 individuals in Quebec is more than double the Canadian average (48 per 100,000) (39). Because Canadian public health insurance plans only partly cover counseling services, low-income, uninsured people have limited access to psychologists (40). In a report on the performance of mental health services, the Quebec Commissioner for Health and Welfare recommended access to psychotherapy for all, as has been mandated in other countries, such as Australia and the United Kingdom (41). In regard to unmet need for information, many health professionals—unlike people with mental disorders—see this as a secondary issue (42). According to a recent study, limited consultation time and the difficulties that some people experience in asking questions are other factors that explain a perceived unmet need for information (43). Low education levels (4), cultural and linguistic barriers (44), or cognitive problems may also explain difficulties in obtaining and understanding information. Finally, consistent with previous findings (1,28,29,31,32), the proportions of perceived unmet and partially met need for medication in our study were very low. However, it has been shown that people with a fully met need do not necessarily feel satisfied with taking medications (43) or may not be taking them properly (45).

Results did not strongly support the study hypotheses. Perceived partially met and unmet need for information was not associated with social support (enabling factor). No association was found between socioeconomic variables (enabling factors) and a perceived partially met or unmet need for counseling. An unmet need for medication was not associated with diagnosis (need factor). However, the variables associated with needs for information and counseling were distinct from the variables associated with a need for medication.

In regard to health service use, the number of health care professionals consulted was negatively associated with perceived unmet information and counseling needs. It seems logical that people who visit fewer health care professionals are more likely to have perceived unmet needs in these two domains. Treating mental disorders usually requires several approaches and complementary treatments, and seeing more professionals might increase treatment motivation and outcomes (20,46,47).

In regard to enabling factors, perception of the neighborhood (neighborhood physical condition, sense of collective efficacy, neighborly behavior, and informal social control) were more strongly associated, positively or negatively, with a partially met and unmet need for information. Neighbors who offer social support may influence people with mental disorders by directing them to professionals, providing information on available services, and offering assistance to reduce barriers to health care use (33,48).

In regard to need factors, the association between stressful events and a perceived unmet need for medication suggests that some people had trouble finding a psychiatrist or a family physician willing to prescribe medication for their stress. The finding that people who committed aggression against property were more likely to perceive their medication and information needs as unmet or only partially met, compared with those who did not commit such aggression, suggests that some individuals may have had problems with the law and therefore may have had limited access to health services because of the reluctance of some professionals to serve this population (49). The issue of stigma might explain the association between verbal aggression and a perceived unmet need for counseling. Fighting stigma is one of the main recommendations of the Quebec Commissioner of Health and Welfare aimed at increasing the performance of mental health services (41).

In regard to predisposing factors, it stands to reason that poor self-perceived mental health was found to be correlated with a partially met need for information. Although medication usually offers rapid improvement of mental disorders, counseling is reported to provide more sustained recovery (50), suggesting that people with more severe or complex symptoms might expect complementary treatments, such as psychotherapy and medication. Previous studies have found a greater level of satisfaction among individuals with mental disorders receiving both medication and psychosocial treatment (33,48). It is more difficult to explain why people who grant little importance to spirituality are more likely than those who do not to have a perceived unmet need for medication. One possibility is that religion or spirituality is a significant protective factor against mental disorders (51).

Finally, consistent with the final hypothesis, overall perceived unmet needs were quite strongly associated with need factors and health service use variables. The fact that people with substance use disorders were more likely to have overall perceived unmet needs may be a consequence of stigma (52) or may stem from a lack of treatment resources. Many professionals are reluctant to treat these clients (53). People with substance use disorders are also more likely to move frequently and to abandon treatment, and they are less likely to use health services (5456). Furthermore, in Quebec, as elsewhere in the world, few specialized services exist for addiction or for co-occurring mental and substance use disorders (57). The association between overall unmet needs and higher cognitive functioning is difficult to explain. It suggests that people with severe cognitive disorders are more likely to be in treatment. The negative association between the number of professionals consulted and overall perceived unmet needs is reasonable, considering that perceived unmet needs were predominantly related to counseling. Furthermore, previous studies have found that perceived unmet needs were more frequent among younger people (1416). Finally, the fact that males tend to consult health care professionals only after a sharp deterioration in their mental or general medical conditions may explain why they were less likely to have perceived unmet needs (58).

This study had a number of limitations. First, the results may reflect characteristics of the population in the catchment area and may not be generalizable to other areas or populations. Second, the severity of mental disorders was not considered. Previous studies have reported a link between perceived unmet needs and level of disability (59). Third, sample attrition from T1 to T3 may have introduced a bias, because participants who remained in the cohort were different from those lost to follow-up. Finally, because all the variables (dependent and independent) emanated from a one-time measurement, it is not possible to infer causality between variables.

Conclusions

This study was the first to compare variables associated with perceived unmet needs for information, medication, and counseling as well as overall perceived unmet needs, based on a comprehensive conceptual framework. The findings indicate that counseling and information needs go unmet more often than the need for medication. The high prevalence of unmet needs, particularly for counseling, seems to be associated with public policies, because unlike medication, counseling is only partially covered by the Quebec public insurance plan. Equitable access to psychotherapy could reduce unmet need for counseling. Moreover, the results show the importance for mental health services of taking neighborhoods into account in disadvantaged areas. Increasing the provision of mental health care in primary care settings could facilitate better access to information for people living in disadvantaged situations. Also, the findings suggest that young people and people with addiction were more likely to have needs that went entirely unmet. Greater effort should be devoted to improving specialized services for these groups and to development of integrated treatment for co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. Finally, fighting stigma should be another priority for mental health services.

Dr. Fleury and Dr. Caron are with the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (e-mail: ). Dr. Grenier, Dr. Bamvita, and Dr. Perreault are with the Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal.

This study was funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CTP-79839).

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

1 Sunderland A, Findlay LC: Perceived need for mental health care in Canada: results from the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey–Mental Health. Health Reports 24:3–9, 2013MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Andrews G, Issakidis C, Carter G: Shortfall in mental health service utilisation. British Journal of Psychiatry 179:417–425, 2001Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Prins MA, Verhaak PFM, van der Meer K, et al.: Primary care patients with anxiety and depression: need for care from the patient’s perspective. Journal of Affective Disorders 119:163–171, 2009Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Fassaert T, de Wit MA, Tuinebreijer WC, et al.: Perceived need for mental health care among non-Western labour migrants. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 44:208–216, 2009Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Andersen RM: Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior 36:1–10, 1995Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Urbanoski KA, Cairney J, Bassani DG, et al.: Perceived unmet need for mental health care for Canadians with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services 59:283–289, 2008LinkGoogle Scholar

7 Starkes JM, Poulin CC, Kisely SR: Unmet need for the treatment of depression in Atlantic Canada. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 50:580–590, 2005Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Boardman J, Henshaw C, Willmott S: Needs for mental health treatment among general practice attenders. British Journal of Psychiatry 185:318–327, 2004Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Craske MG, Waters AM: Panic disorder, phobias, and generalized anxiety disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 1:197–225, 2005Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Mojtabai R, Fochtmann L, Chang S-W, et al.: Unmet need for mental health care in schizophrenia: an overview of literature and new data from a first-admission study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 35:679–695, 2009Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Katerndahl DA, Realini JP: Use of health care services by persons with panic symptoms. Psychiatric Services 48:1027–1032, 1997LinkGoogle Scholar

12 Hasin DS, Goodwin RD, Stinson FS, et al.: Epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry 62:1097–1106, 2005Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Wang PS, Berglund P, Kessler RC: Recent care of common mental disorders in the United States: prevalence and conformance with evidence-based recommendations. Journal of General Internal Medicine 15:284–292, 2000Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14 Mojtabai R: Unmet need for treatment of major depression in the United States. Psychiatric Services 60:297–305, 2009LinkGoogle Scholar

15 Nelson CH, Park J: The nature and correlates of unmet health care needs in Ontario, Canada. Social Science and Medicine 62:2291–2300, 2006Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16 Lehtinen V, Joukamaa M, Jyrkinen E, et al.: Need for mental health services of the adult population in Finland: results from the Mini Finland Health Survey. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 81:426–431, 1990Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

17 Lefebvre J, Cyr M, Lesage A, et al.: Unmet needs in the community: can existing services meet them? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 102:65–70, 2000Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

18 Grella CE, Karno MP, Warda US, et al.: Perceptions of need and help received for substance dependence in a national probability survey. Psychiatric Services 60:1068–1074, 2009LinkGoogle Scholar

19 Lasalvia A, Bonetto C, Malchiodi F, et al.: Listening to patients’ needs to improve their subjective quality of life. Psychological Medicine 35:1655–1665, 2005Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

20 Lasalvia A, Bonetto C, Salvi G, et al.: Predictors of changes in needs for care in patients receiving community psychiatric treatment: a 4-year follow-up study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum 116:31–41, 2007CrossrefGoogle Scholar

21 Slade M, Leese M, Cahill S, et al.: Patient-rated mental health needs and quality of life improvement. British Journal of Psychiatry 187:256–261, 2005Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

22 Slade M, Leese M, Ruggeri M, et al.: Does meeting needs improve quality of life? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 73:183–189, 2004Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

23 Björkman T, Hansson L: Predictors of improvement in quality of life of long-term mentally ill individuals receiving case management. European Psychiatry 17:33–40, 2002Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

24 Fleury MJ, Grenier G, Bamvita JM, et al.: Predictors of quality of life in a longitudinal study of users with severe mental disorders. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 11:92, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

25 Leaf PJ, Bruce ML, Tischler GL: The differential effect of attitudes on the use of mental health services. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 21:187–192, 1986Google Scholar

26 Fleury MJ, Ngui AN, Bamvita JM, et al.: Predictors of healthcare service utilization for mental health reasons. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11:10559–10586, 2014Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

27 Latkin CA, Curry AD: Stressful neighborhoods and depression: a prospective study of the impact of neighborhood disorder. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 44:34–44, 2003Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

28 Meadows G, Singh B, Burgess P, et al.: Psychiatry and the need for mental health care in Australia: findings from the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36:210–216, 2002Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

29 Meadows GN, Burgess PM: Perceived need for mental health care: findings from the 2007 Australian Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 43:624–634, 2009Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

30 Meadows GN, Bobevski I: Changes in met perceived need for mental healthcare in Australia from 1997 to 2007. British Journal of Psychiatry 199:479–484, 2011Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

31 Sareen J, Cox BJ, Afifi TO, et al.: Combat and peacekeeping operations in relation to prevalence of mental disorders and perceived need for mental health care: findings from a large representative sample of military personnel. Archives of General Psychiatry 64:843–852, 2007Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

32 Seekles WM, Cuijpers P, van de Ven P, et al.: Personality and perceived need for mental health care among primary care patients. Journal of Affective Disorders 136:666–674, 2012Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

33 Perreault M, Rogers WL, Leichner P, et al.: Patients’ requests and satisfaction with services in an outpatient psychiatric setting. Psychiatric Services 47:287–292, 1996LinkGoogle Scholar

34 Fleury MJ, Grenier G, Bamvita J-M, et al.: Comprehensive determinants of health service utilisation for mental health reasons in a Canadian catchment area. International Journal for Equity in Health 11:20, 2012Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

35 Kosidou K, Dalman C, Lundberg M, et al.: Socioeconomic status and risk of psychological distress and depression in the Stockholm Public Health Cohort: a population-based study. Journal of Affective Disorders 134:160–167, 2011Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

36 Torvik FA, Rognmo K, Tambs K: Alcohol use and mental distress as predictors of non-response in a general population health survey: the HUNT study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 47:805–816, 2012Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

37 Meadows G, Burgess P, Fossey E, et al.: Perceived need for mental health care, findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being. Psychological Medicine 30:645–656, 2000Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

38 Prins MA, Verhaak PF, Bensing JM, et al.: Health beliefs and perceived need for mental health care of anxiety and depression—the patients’ perspective explored. Clinical Psychology Review 28:1038–1058, 2008Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

39 CIHI: Health Care in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2008Google Scholar

40 Fleury MJ, Grenier G, Bamvita JM, et al.: Typology of adults diagnosed with mental disorders based on socio-demographics and clinical and service use characteristics. BMC Psychiatry 11:67, 2011Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

41 Report on the Performance Appraisal of the Health and Social Services System [in French]. Montreal, Quebec, Commissioner for Health and Welfare, 2012Google Scholar

42 Middelboe T, Mackeprang T, Hansson L, et al.: The Nordic Study on schizophrenic patients living in the community: subjective needs and perceived help. European Psychiatry 16:207–214, 2001Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

43 Fossey E, Harvey C, Mokhtari MR, et al.: Self-rated assessment of needs for mental health care: a qualitative analysis. Community Mental Health Journal 48:407–419, 2012Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

44 Scheppers E, van Dongen E, Dekker J, et al.: Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: a review. Family Practice 23:325–348, 2006Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

45 Mullins CD, Shaya FT, Meng F, et al.: Persistence, switching, and discontinuation rates among patients receiving sertraline, paroxetine, and citalopram. Pharmacotherapy 25:660–667, 2005Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

46 Kessler RC, Zhao S, Katz SJ, et al.: Past-year use of outpatient services for psychiatric problems in the National Comorbidity Survey. American Journal of Psychiatry 156:115–123, 1999LinkGoogle Scholar

47 Edlund MJ, Wang PS, Berglund PA, et al.: Dropping out of mental health treatment: patterns and predictors among epidemiological survey respondents in the United States and Ontario. American Journal of Psychiatry 159:845–851, 2002LinkGoogle Scholar

48 Fleury MJ, Imboua A, Aubé D, et al.: General practitioners’ management of mental disorders: a rewarding practice with considerable obstacles. BMC Family Practice 13:19, 2012Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

49 Rueve ME, Welton RS: Violence and mental illness. Psychiatry 5:34–48, 2008MedlineGoogle Scholar

50 Williams JWJ Jr, Gerrity M, Holsinger T, et al.: Systematic review of multifaceted interventions to improve depression care. General Hospital Psychiatry 29:91–116, 2007Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

51 Verghese A: Spirituality and mental health. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 50:233–237, 2008Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

52 Schomerus G, Lucht M, Holzinger A, et al.: The stigma of alcohol dependence compared with other mental disorders: a review of population studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism 46:105–112, 2011Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

53 van Boekel LC, Brouwers EP, van Weeghel J, et al.: Healthcare professionals’ regard towards working with patients with substance use disorders: comparison of primary care, general psychiatry and specialist addiction services. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 134:92–98, 2014Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

54 Urbanoski KA, Rush BR, Wild TC, et al.: Use of mental health care services by Canadians with co-occurring substance dependence and mental disorders. Psychiatric Services 58:962–969, 2007LinkGoogle Scholar

55 Cunningham JA, Breslin FC: Only one in three people with alcohol abuse or dependence ever seek treatment. Addictive Behaviors 29:221–223, 2004Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

56 Tuchman E: Women and addiction: the importance of gender issues in substance abuse research. Journal of Addictive Diseases 29:127–138, 2010Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

57 Torrey WC, Drake RE, Cohen M, et al.: The challenge of implementing and sustaining integrated dual disorders treatment programs. Community Mental Health Journal 38:507–521, 2002Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

58 Möller-Leimkühler AM: Barriers to help-seeking by men: a review of sociocultural and clinical literature with particular reference to depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 71:1–9, 2002Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

59 Sareen J, Stein MB, Campbell DW, et al.: The relation between perceived need for mental health treatment, DSM diagnosis, and quality of life: a Canadian population-based survey. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 50:87–94, 2005Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar