The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.43.8.833

We found that patients in a state hospital were reasonably informed about Operation Desert Storm. Patients who had better orientation and patients who had spent less time in the hospital demonstrated a higher degree of knowledge, compared with longer-stay, less-well-oriented patients. The opinions of patients in this sample reflected those held in the wider society. Patients did not show significant cognitive on behavioral disturbances in response to this international crisis. We believe that these responses may be due to the insulating, stress-mediating factors associated with living in the hospital, compared with living in the community.

As we move forward with efforts to treat seriously and persistently mentally ill patients in the community, there is a lesson to be learned from inpatients' reactions to Operation Desert Storm. We must recognize that the state hospital still acts as an asylum in mediating the stress of national and international events. In stressful times, providers of community-based care must take steps to see that their services fulfill that stress-mediating function for patients who now live outside the traditional asylum.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.