The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.41.4.419

Patterns of service use and costs in two similar model day hospital— inn programs for psychiatric patients in publicly funded hospitals in Boston and Tucson are compared. Implementation of the programs resulted in cost savings at both sites, although mean annual costs per patient were much lower in Tucson than in Boston. Compared with patients at the Boston site, patients in Tucson had more admissions but shorter stays and fewer days in the program during a 12-month follow-up period. Site-specific differences in the programs, in local practice patterns, and in state mental health funding levels may have influenced cost differences.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.