The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.37.7.725

Psychiatrists have been held liable for violent acts committed by their patients when more than an error in professional judgment could be demonstrated. The authors describe several recent court cases in which judges have ignored or distorted acceptable clinical practices, conceivably creating a new liability standard whereby a tragic outcome is considered the result of failure to apply appropriate judgment. Following discussion of the cases are recommendations for managing the risks attendant to psychiatric decision making today, such as gathering as much of the patient's history as possible, obtaining previous records, documenting clinical reasoning, and consulting colleagues. Reforms for the legal process are also suggested.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.