American Psychiatry's Fundamental Policy Is to Foster the Patient's Good
Abstract
As long as psychiatrists are human, there will be episodes of unethical psychiatric practice and ineffective, sometimes damaging psychiatric treatment. The author argues that these incidents do not detract from the overall integrity of the profession, the reality of mental illness, or the increasing sophistication of psychiatric treatment and knowledge. Rather than being oppressive, as a minority of former patients have charged, the policies of the American Psychiatric Association related to patient care are broadly worded ethical principles intended to foster the patient's good. The author defends the need for involuntary treatment and suggests that controversies surrounding involuntary treatment, the insanity defense, and the homeless mentally ill are essentially social, legal, and legislative issues in which psychiatry has found itself in the middle.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
