Securing Patients' Rights—Responsibly
Abstract
The patients' rights activist has power without clinical responsibility. Major problems can result when power is wielded by people who lack an appreciation of the clinical complexities of work with the severely mentally ill. The patients' rights movement has been an extremely constructive force, but every movement, no matter how well intended, must be monitored so that more good than harm is done. Two advocacy cases in which the struggle itself seemed to be more important to the advocates than the rights or welfare of the patients are described. Mental health professionals should not treat patients' rights as if they were a sacred cow, but should distinguish responsible advocacy from irresponsible advocacy. Long-term, severely ill patients, in particular, need to be protected from irresponsible "benefactors." The author's suggestions include that advocates be required to have experience providing direct service to severely disturbed patients for six months to a year and that advocates be rigorously screened within bureaucracies.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
