The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.30.9.599

The process of deinstitutionalization began almost unnoticed in 1955 as state hospital populations started to decline, and it proceeded without adequate planning and without development of a social consensus. The inevitable result was strong criticism, severe personal dislocations, and, with rare exceptions, programmatic chaos. The authors trace and describe the reasons for the growing polarizatian about deinstitutionalization among such groups as mental health professionals, public officials, families, advocacy groups, citizens, and unions. They also note that between 1950 and 1970 the total institutionalized population in the U.S. was not reduced but simply shifted. Deinstitutionalization should focus not on the location of care but on the broader problem of improving the lot of persons with chronic illness, regardless of its cause or time of onset, the authors suggest. They outline the basic elements ofa service and financing system to meet both the daily-living and the specifically medical needs of the chronically ill.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.