The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.30.4.243

In a recent six-month period, a state-operated community mental health center was required to gather data for nine major surveys, reviews, and budget requests. Such surveys cover much the same ground, yet without any attempt to standardize formats so that the data a center compiles for one survey can be used in the next. The surveys frequently are not designed for the programs required to complete them; they are a drain on increasingly scarce staff time and deplete staff morale. A two-part solution to the problem would involve coordination and control of the demands for data, perhaps through the development of a model mental health data set and format by the National Institute of Mental Health, and the development of locally based, smaller-scale information systems. The latter step would generate more complete and reliable data for local clinicians and administrators and yield a limited amount of basic information to be used by outside agencies.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.