The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

To the Editor: In his interesting column on evidence-based treatments in the May issue, Dennis Morrison (10) gives us a clear example of a logical fallacy often seen in the evidence-based arena. Dr. Morrison states, "[T]he board of directors of CBH issued the following mandate, 'The Center will operate only those mental health treatments, services, and programs for which there exists evidence in the professional literature of their efficacy.' " Later in the piece, he begins a sentence as follows: "When the board … issued its directive that we provide only treatments that work … ." (Who wishes to provide treatments that don't work?) This is a shining example of the common error of interpreting "not proven effective" as "proven ineffective."

Dr. Puryear is in private practice in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and on the clinical faculty of the University of New Mexico Medical School.

Reference

1. Morrison D: Real-world use of evidence-based treatments in community behavioral health care. Psychiatric Services 55:485–487, 2004LinkGoogle Scholar