The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
LetterFull Access

Tarasoff Warnings

To the Editor: In the article by Huber and associates (1) in the June 2000 issue about police experience with Tarasoff warnings, the authors concluded that "calling the police may not always be the best way to protect potential victims from threatening patients." Their conclusion comes as no surprise. In the Tarasoff case, which in the 1970s established the duty to protect potential victims, the therapist of the threatening patient turned to the police, who interviewed and then released the patient, setting the stage for Ms. Tarasoff's subsequent murder (2).

Dr. Leeman is clinical professor of psychiatry and faculty associate in the division of humanities in medicine at the State University of New York Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn.

References

1. Huber MG, Balon R, Labbate LA, et al: A survey of police officers' experience with Tarasoff warnings in two states. Psychiatric Services 51:807-809, 2000LinkGoogle Scholar

2. Appelbaum PS: Tarasoff and the clinician: problems in fulfilling the duty to protect. American Journal of Psychiatry 142:425-429, 1985LinkGoogle Scholar