0
Current Issue
CURRENT ISSUE
October 2014
Table of Contents
Cover Caption

Psychiatric Services

A Journal of the American Psychiatric Association Editor: Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D.
Articles  |  October 1, 2014
Italy’s Spiking Antidepressant Use: A Matter of Public Health?

Like the rest of the world, Italy has experienced a surge in use of antidepressants. As this study documents, use of antidepressants in Italy increased fourfold between 2001 and 2011, a period that saw the introduction of SSRIs, the arrival of several new classes of antidepressants, and the marketing of many antidepressants for anxiety disorders. Despite some positive aspects of this trend, the authors note, public health authorities should examine whether they are doing all they can to reduce depression, especially during a period of economic upheaval.

Open Forum  |  October 1, 2014
“Diagnostic Relabeling” and the Effort to Erase Stigma

Some have argued that giving schizophrenia another name—“dopamine dysregulation disorder” or “youth onset conative, cognitive and reality distortion”—will erase stigma. “I admire the spirit of these efforts,” writes the author of this month’s Open Forum, “but their focus may be problematic.” In fact, he argues, diagnostic relabeling places the responsibility for stigma change with mental health professionals rather than where it belongs, squarely in the control of people with lived experience. After all, he said, it was people of color—not well-intentioned outside groups—who tore down racism.

Columns  |  October 1, 2014
In a Shift, Supreme Court Defers to Mental Health Expertise

The Supreme Court decision in Hall v. Florida may be a sign of a new, more positive attitude by the court toward mental health expertise, according to the Law & Psychiatry column. In siding with the APA and other professional groups, the court ruled that states must avoid setting a hard cutoff for IQ score when determining whether a defendant is eligible for the death penalty. Defendants must be able to present additional evidence of intellectual disability, including the testimony of medical experts, the court said.

View Current Issue Contents >