The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
LettersFull Access

Compulsory Community Treatment and Homicide: Insufficient Evidence Now and in the Future

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.670711

TO THE EDITOR: In their Open Forum commentary, Barnes and Badre (1) expressed concerns about mandated outpatient treatment—in particular, the use of antipsychotic medication in such treatment. They noted that there is no empirical evidence that compulsory community treatment reduces admissions to the hospital or bed use (2). Furthermore, as they described, compulsory community treatment almost always implies long-term use of antipsychotic medication, which can have a negative influence on social functioning (3). Barnes and Badre also commented that in most jurisdictions compulsory community treatment is introduced after a public outcry when a person with mental illness has killed someone. In none of the studies that they cited was reduction of danger to others a primary outcome, and if Barnes and Badre had wanted to focus on randomized controlled trials to assess whether compulsory community treatment reduces danger to others, it would have been impossible for them to do so.

Murder or manslaughter by a psychiatric patient is a rare event. Even if patients stop taking their medication, they rarely become violent. Randomized controlled trials are not suitable to investigate rare events, because researchers cannot recruit millions of participants. They have to use nonrandomized studies with large samples. Immediately after the introduction of compulsory community treatment in England, there was a reduction in the number of homicides committed by people with mental illness, but this trend did not continue (4)—and even if it had, the evidence would not have been sufficient to support a causal influence (5).

Therefore, Barnes and Badre could have drawn an even stronger conclusion. Not only is there insufficient empirical evidence for the effectiveness of compulsory community treatment, but it is also very unlikely that there will be sufficient evidence in the future, at least if reduction of violence toward others is the main aim.

Dr. Hubbeling is with the Wandsworth Crisis and Home Treatment Team, South West London and St. George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London.
References

1 Barnes SS, Badre N: Is the evidence strong enough to warrant long-term antipsychotic use in compulsory outpatient treatment? Psychiatric Services (Epub ahead of print, March 15, 2016)LinkGoogle Scholar

2 Kisely SR, Campbell LA: Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 12:CD004408, 2014MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Wunderink L, Nieboer RM, Wiersma D, et al.: Recovery in remitted first-episode psychosis at 7 years of follow-up of an early dose reduction/discontinuation or maintenance treatment strategy: long-term follow-up of a 2-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 70:913–920, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Appleby L, Kapur N, Shaw J, et al.: The National Confidential Inquiry Into Suicide and Homicide by People With Mental Illness Annual Report 2015: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Manchester, University of Manchester, 2015Google Scholar

5 Swanson JW: Explaining rare acts of violence: the limits of evidence from population research. Psychiatric Services 62:1369–1371, 2011LinkGoogle Scholar