The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.51.7.938

In Reply: I admire Dr. Ozarin, who was one of the few NIMH staff members in the 1970s and 1980s who was aware of the increasingly obvious failure of deinstitutionalization. But her letter alludes to one source of the problem. When NIMH did make money available for model programs, it was usually done with little or no coordination with the states, or evaluation, or follow-up. Funding for the community mental health centers (CMHCs), for example, specifically bypassed the state mental health agencies. NIMH then did virtually nothing to ensure that the CMHCs provided care for individuals with serious mental illnesses. NIMH acted as a federal Santa Claus but was nowhere in sight a month later when the toys had been broken.

Dr. Ozarin also asks, "Where were the researchers in the universities and medical schools?" In the mid-1970s, NIMH was giving psychiatric training programs more than $100 million each year with no strings attached. Why didn't NIMH require them to do something for the money?