The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Open ForumFull Access

NIDILRR: Supporting Applied Research and Development to Improve the Lives of People With Mental Illness

Abstract

This Open Forum describes the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), a component of the Administration for Community Living under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIDILRR funds applied research and development projects to improve the abilities of individuals with disabilities, including those with mental illness, to perform activities of their choice in the community and to expand society’s capacity to provide full opportunities and accommodations for its citizens with disabilities.

The National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) is housed in the Administration for Community Living, under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1). As reflected in its long-range plan, NIDILRR funds applied research and development that address the following mission: “To generate new knowledge and promote its effective use to maximize the full inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent living, family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals with disabilities of all ages” (2). NIDILRR emphasizes the social model of disability rather than the medical model. The social model posits that disability results from a lack of fit between people’s impairments and their environments, both physical and social. Changes in those environments can, therefore, improve those individuals’ participation and well-being (3). NIDILRR also stresses the importance of participation and input of stakeholders in research and development, particularly on the part of people with disabilities. This focus encourages selection of research and development topics relevant to the lives of people with disabilities and emphasizes the contributions of people with disabilities to the entire research or development process, from the identification of research or development questions through dissemination.

Since its inception in 1979, NIDILRR has funded research and development to better enable individuals with mental illness to live the lives they want to live in their communities. The agency’s original driving principle, which is still influential today, was that people with mental illnesses, similar to people with physical disabilities, deserve services and supports that enable them to live the best lives possible (4). Consistent with the social model of disability, this rehabilitation approach emphasizes the importance of both individual-level and environmental changes. Rehabilitation for people with mental illness is not about curing or preventing mental illness; instead, like physical rehabilitation, it is about enabling people to live the lives they want to live.

NIDILRR’s conceptual approach has obvious parallels with the concept of recovery that has been described and promoted by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) (5). The two agencies have long shared a common mission and vision. In fact, for the past 4 decades, NIDILRR and its grantees have collaborated with SAMHSA to identify and support the most important goals of rehabilitation research for people with mental illness, to conduct it, and to put the resulting research findings into use. This collaboration began in 1979, early in NIDILRR’s and SAMHSA’s histories. Several sources (68) detail the histories of NIDILRR (formerly the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and, before that, the National Institute on Handicapped Research) and SAMHSA.

NIDILRR funds mental illness research and development in all three of the agency’s outcome domains: health and function, community living and participation, and employment. NIDILRR has supported research to address gaps in the knowledge base (9) and to inform the development of evidence-based practices such as supported employment (10, 11), vocational cognitive remediation (12), and self-management approaches for people with mental illness (13). The agency has also supported research and development that led to promising practices such as supported education and its integration with supported employment (14). Consistent with its emphasis on stakeholder involvement, NIDILRR has funded research on peer support and peer-provided services (13, 15, 16). Additionally, NIDILRR grantees have contributed to federal efforts in the area of mental illness (1719).

NIDILRR’s mental illness portfolio includes nearly all of the agency’s grant mechanisms, including postdoctoral grants, field-initiated grants, and Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers (1). Information about NIDILRR’s portfolio can be found on the website for the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC) (www.naric.com), the dissemination center funded by NIDILRR. NARIC maintains a searchable database of NIDILRR-funded grants. NARIC also collects, catalogs, and disseminates publications and other products of the projects funded by NIDILRR and broadcasts announcements regarding NIDILRR funding opportunities.

Since 1979, NIDILRR grantees have addressed the agency’s mission by generating new knowledge and promoting its effective use to enable individuals with disabilities to perform activities of their choice in the community and to expand society’s capacity to provide full opportunities and accommodations for its citizens with disabilities. The results of NIDILRR-funded research strongly support the propositions that these goals can be achieved for people with mental illness and that society can use research to promote the ability of members of this important population to live the meaningful lives they want to live.

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, Administration for Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
Send correspondence to Dr. Caplan, c/o Dr. Phillip Beatty ().

The author reports no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

1 About the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). Washington, DC, Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, 2019. https://acl.gov/about-acl/about-national-institute-disability-independent-living-and-rehabilitation-research. Accessed March 17, 2020Google Scholar

2 National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR): 2018–2023 Long-Range Plan. Washington, DC, Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, 2019. https://acl.gov/sites/default/files/about-acl/2019-01/NIDILRR%20LRP-2018-2023-Final.pdfGoogle Scholar

3 Shakespeare T: The social model of disability; in The Disability Studies Reader, 4th ed. Edited by Davis LJ. New York, Taylor & Francis, 2013Google Scholar

4 Anthony WA: Explaining “psychiatric rehabilitation” by an analogy to “physical rehabilitation.” Psychosoc Rehabil J 1982; 5:61–65Google Scholar

5 SAMHSA’s Working Definition of Recovery. Rockville, MD, Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2012. https://store.samhsa.gov/system/files/pep12-recdef.pdfGoogle Scholar

6 Leclair RR: National Institute of Handicapped Research (NIHR): a giant step for expanded rehabilitation research. Bull Prosthet Res 1979; 16:1–5MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 National Research Council: Review of Disability and Rehabilitation Research: NIDRR Grantmaking Processes and Products. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2012Google Scholar

8 Institute of Medicine: Research and Service Programs in the PHS: Challenges in the Organization, Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 1991Google Scholar

9 Kaplan K, Brusilovskiy E, O’Shea AM, et al.: Child protective service disparities and serious mental illnesses: results from a national survey. Psychiatr Serv 2019; 70:202–208LinkGoogle Scholar

10 Bond GR, Kim SJ, Becker DR, et al.: A controlled trial of supported employment for people with severe mental illness and justice involvement. Psychiatr Serv 2015; 66:1027–1034LinkGoogle Scholar

11 Ellison ML, Klodnick VV, Bond GR, et al.: Adapting supported employment for emerging adults with serious mental health conditions. J Behav Health Serv Res 2015; 42:206–222Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 McGurk SR, Mueser KT, Xie H, et al.: Cognitive remediation for vocational rehabilitation nonresponders. Schizophr Res 2016; 175:48–56Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Cook JA, Copeland ME, Jonikas JA, et al.: Results of a randomized controlled trial of mental illness self-management using wellness recovery action planning. Schizophr Bull 2012; 38:881–891Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14 Maru M, Rogers ES, Hutchinson D, et al.: An integrated supported employment and education model: exploratory study of an innovative approach designed to better meet the needs of young adults with psychiatric conditions. J Behav Health Serv Res 2018; 45:489–498Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15 Salzer MS, Schwenk E, Brusilovskiy E: Certified peer specialist roles and activities: results from a national survey. Psychiatr Serv 2010; 61:520–523LinkGoogle Scholar

16 Russinova Z, Rogers ES, Gagne C, et al.: A randomized controlled trial of a peer-run antistigma photovoice intervention. Psychiatr Serv 2014; 65:242–246LinkGoogle Scholar

17 Institute of Medicine and National Research Council: Improving the Health, Safety, and Well-being of Young Adults: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2013Google Scholar

18 The Way Forward: Federal Action for a System That Works for All People Living With SMI and SED and Their Families and Caregivers—Full Report. Rockville, MD, Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2017. https://store.samhsa.gov/product/The-Way-Forward-Federal-Action-for-a-System-That-Works-for-All-People-Living-With-SMI-and-SED-and-Their-Families-and-Caregivers-Full-Report/PEP17-ISMICC-RTCGoogle Scholar

19 Feasibility Study for Demonstration of Supported Education to Promote Educational Attainment and Employment Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness: Final Report. Washington, DC, US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, 2015. https://aspe.hhs.gov/report/feasibility-study-demonstration-supported-education-promote-educational-attainment-and-employment-among-individuals-serious-mental-illness-final-reportGoogle Scholar