The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
LettersFull Access

Relationship Between Supervisor Factors and Therapist Knowledge, Attitudes, and Use of EBP in a Large Public Behavioral Health System

TO THE EDITOR: Research has identified the importance of supervisors in implementation processes, given their ongoing support of therapists’ skill development and competence in evidence-based practice (EBP) (1,2). It is therefore crucial to understand the specific supervisor characteristics that facilitate or hinder implementation of EBP. Findings from the organizational and management fields suggest that supervisor understanding of and commitment to innovation may affect staff knowledge of and attitudes toward EBP (3). Two supervisor characteristics that may reflect supervisor understanding of and commitment to innovation include supervisor knowledge of and attitudes toward EBP. Given the limited research in this area, we examined whether supervisor knowledge of and attitudes toward EBP are related to therapist implementation factors (knowledge of and attitudes toward EBP) and implementation outcomes (the self-reported use of EBP).

Quantitative survey data were collected from therapists (N=114) and their direct clinical supervisors (N=35) within 22 organizations who participated in at least one of four cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)–focused EBP implementation initiatives in Philadelphia. The selection of organizations for participation in the EBP initiatives has evolved from a nonuniform selection of organizations to a competitive process where organizations apply for participation through a request-for-applications process. Organizations and participating therapists were provided with gold-standard training and ongoing consultation with expert treatment developers (4); organizations implementing one of the EBPs were provided an enhanced financial rate for the provision of that EBP.

Participants were recruited from the aforementioned publicly funded community behavioral health organizations that were implementing EBP. Between January and June 2015, potential participants attended a one-time meeting where research staff presented an overview of the research study, obtained informed consent, and administered measures assessing supervisor and therapist knowledge of and attitudes toward EBP, therapist use of cognitive, behavioral, and family therapy modalities, and information about the supervisory context.

Using PROC MIXED in SAS 9.0, we conducted nine mixed-effects linear regression models to test the relationship between supervisor characteristics (knowledge and attitudes) and therapist implementation factors (knowledge and attitudes) and outcomes (CBT use). Random intercepts for organization were included to account for nesting of therapists within organizations.

Contrary to our expectations, supervisor knowledge of and attitudes toward EBP were not predictive of therapist knowledge, attitudes, or self-reported CBT use. This was surprising in that previous literature documents the relationship between supervision and successful implementation of EBP in community settings (5). One explanation for the null findings may be supervision content and delivery methods. Although supervisors reported that nearly all clinicians were receiving supervision, less than 15% (N=4) of supervisors reported using active learning methods (such as audio recording), which are evidence-based supervisory strategies (5). In addition, perhaps supervisors do not exert influence on individual therapists but rather inculcate an environment at the organizational level to facilitate innovation implementation (2). Further qualitative and quantitative research is needed to better understand the role of supervisors in facilitating EBP implementation in community settings.

Ms. DeNard is with the School of Social Policy and Practice and Dr. Beidas is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Dr. Skriner is with Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, White Plains.
Send correspondence to Dr. Beidas (e-mail: ).

This research project was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant K23MH099179.

Dr. Beidas receives royalties from Oxford University Press and has consulted for Merck. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

1 Nadeem E, Gleacher A, Beidas RS: Consultation as an implementation strategy for evidence-based practices across multiple contexts: unpacking the black box. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 40:439–450, 2013. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23716145Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ: Uncovering middle managers’ role in healthcare innovation implementation. Implementation Science 7:28, 2012. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22472001Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Floyd SW, Wooldridge B: Managing strategic consensus: the foundation of effective implementation. Executive 6:27–39, 1992CrossrefGoogle Scholar

4 Beidas RS, Adams DR, Kratz HE, et al.: Lessons learned while building a trauma-informed public behavioral health system in the City of Philadelphia. Evaluation and Program Planning 59:21–32, 2016Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Milne D: Evidence-Based Clinical Supervision. West Sussex, UK, Blackwell, 2009Google Scholar