The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
DatapointsFull Access

Clozapine for Schizophrenia: State Variation in Evidence-Based Practice

Clozapine is the only antipsychotic with known efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Although 20% to 30% of individuals with schizophrenia have treatment-resistant conditions, clozapine accounts for only about 5% of their antipsychotic starts (1).We updated our previous analysis (2001–2005) by examining more recent (2006–2009) trends and patterns across 46 state Medicaid programs.

Overall, clozapine accounted for 4.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]=4.8%–4.9%) of antipsychotic use in schizophrenia, with a slight decline during this period: 5.7% (CI=5.6%–5.8%) in 2006; 4.9% (CI=4.8%–5.0%) in 2007; 4.6% (CI=4.5%–4.6%) in 2008; and 4.3% (CI=4.2%–4.4%) in 2009. Figure 1 shows substantial interstate variation. Clozapine was least commonly used in the Deep South and more commonly used in New England, the Rocky Mountain West, and Washington. The highest rate was in South Dakota (15.6%, CI=14.0%–17.2%) and the lowest in Louisiana (2.0%, CI=1.9%–2.2%).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1. Clozapine prescribing rates among Medicaid-insured adults with schizophrenia, 2006–2009

Fiscal stress has been linked to lower clozapine use (2), as has inadequate staffing to monitor clozapine (3). The state variations are broadly consistent with known variations in overall Medicaid spending for disabled beneficiaries. Patient reluctance about blood monitoring and concerns over tolerability are unlikely to explain the variation.

These findings underscore the need to determine the extent to which state variation can be explained by local practice environments or state policy factors. Interventions and policies are needed to promote appropriate clozapine treatment of Medicaid-insured patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Dr. Olfson and Dr. Stroup are with the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (e-mail: ). Dr. Gerhard and Dr. Crystal are with the Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Amy M. Kilbourne, Ph.D., M.P.H., and Tami L. Mark, Ph.D., are editors of this column.

This project was funded by the Stanley Medical Research Institute.

Dr. Olfson has received grant funds from Sunovion. Dr. Gerhard has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck and compensation from Roche as an expert witness. Dr. Stroup has participated in CME sponsored by Genentech and has received research funds from Auspex Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Crystal reports no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

1 Stroup TS, Gerhard T, Crystal S, et al.: Geographic and clinical variation in clozapine use in the United States. Psychiatric Services 65:186–192, 2014LinkGoogle Scholar

2 Leslie DL, Rosenheck R: The effect of institutional fiscal stress on the use of atypical antipsychotic medications in the treatment of schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 189:377–383, 2001Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Gee S, Vergunst F, Howes O, et al.: Practitioner attitudes to clozapine initiation. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 130:16–24, 2014Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar