The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Abstract

Objective:

This evaluation compared the effectiveness of MOVE!, a U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VHA) weight management program, among veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), other mental conditions, or no mental health diagnoses.

Methods:

VHA administrative data from 2008 to 2012 were used to estimate adjusted six- and 12-month weight change and ≥5% weight loss among 20,819 veterans with “intense and sustained” MOVE! participation (14% of 148,963 MOVE! participants, regardless of mental health status).

Results:

Compared with veterans with no mental health diagnoses, veterans with PTSD lost significantly less weight at six and 12 months (p<.05) and were less likely to lose ≥5% body weight at six months (OR=.89, p<.05). At six months, those with other mental conditions lost significantly less weight than those with no mental health diagnoses (p<.05).

Conclusions:

MOVE! may need adaptation to increase overall engagement and enhance weight loss for veterans with mental conditions, especially PTSD.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is prevalent among veterans (13) and is associated with chronic physiological arousal and poor health behaviors (4,5), such as physical inactivity (6) and unhealthy diet (7). As a result, veterans with PTSD are at increased risk of overweight and obesity, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes (4). Thus it is important to ensure that PTSD-diagnosed veterans have access to effective behavioral weight management services.

An evidence-based program called MOVE! has been implemented throughout the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. MOVE! includes group classes and individual instruction that promote weight loss through diet and physical activity (8). Approximately one-fifth of veterans who participated in MOVE! lost at least 5% of their body weight in six months (8). Achieving this measure nearly doubled among patients who attained “intense and sustained” participation (≥8 visits in a four- to six-month period) (8). Although MOVE! has potential to reduce disease burden, little is known about its effectiveness for veterans with PTSD.

This retrospective evaluation of a national behavioral weight management program compared weight loss among veterans with and without PTSD who achieved intense and sustained MOVE! participation. We hypothesized that because of the unique challenges related to PTSD, veterans with PTSD would lose less weight compared with veterans with other mental conditions or with no mental health diagnoses.

Methods

Details regarding MOVE! participants are available elsewhere (8). Veterans with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m2 or a BMI of 25–29.99 kg/m2 and at least one obesity-related comorbidity are eligible for MOVE! We used visit and outcome data from the MOVE! database comprising 148,963 patients who had attended at least two MOVE! sessions during fiscal years 2008–2012.

A total of 29 outliers with a baseline weight of more than 500 pounds or a six- or 12-month weight change of more than 100 pounds were removed. Analyses were limited to the 20,819 (14%) participants from the full MOVE! sample with intense and sustained participation, given that these individuals received a “dose” found to be effective (8). There were no differences by mental health status (PTSD, other mental conditions, or no mental health diagnoses) in the proportion that achieved this measure of MOVE! engagement (14% of each group; p=.91). Participants whose weights were available six (N=16,551, 79.5%) or 12 (N=13,270, 63.7%) months after enrollment were included in the effectiveness analyses. They represented 11% and 9%, respectively, of the full MOVE! sample.

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the VHA Ann Arbor Medical Center agreed that this project was consistent with an existing IRB approval, granting a waiver of informed consent. VHA Puget Sound’s Research and Development committee also approved this project.

Outcomes for this evaluation were total weight change and clinically meaningful weight loss (≥5% body weight) (9) and were assessed at six and 12 months following a veteran’s baseline visit to MOVE! (index enrollment date). The MOVE! database captures patient weights at 180-day increments after the index enrollment date, which include data collected during the 60-day window before and after each increment (8).

The independent variable was mental health status: PTSD, other mental condition or conditions but no PTSD; and no mental health diagnoses. Mental health diagnosis was determined by the presence in VHA medical record data of at least one inpatient or outpatient visit with an ICD-9-CM code for one of the following conditions in the year of or in the year preceding the index enrollment date: PTSD; schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other psychotic disorders; bipolar disorder; depressive disorders; alcohol or other substance abuse or dependence; dementia; other anxiety disorder; and personality disorder.

Covariate selection was guided by a prior MOVE! evaluation (10), and variables were obtained from VHA medical record data. Standard sociodemographic characteristics included age, sex, race-ethnicity, and marital status. Any service connection (injury, ailment, disease, or disability due to military service) was included because it facilitates access to care, and Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) status, confirmed by OEF/OIF roster, was included because OEF/OIF veterans with mental conditions are at increased risk of obesity (11) but have suboptimal engagement in care (2).

We also examined exposure to obesogenic psychotropic medication (use for 30 or more days and one or more refills or two supplies of prescriptions in the six months prior to MOVE! for six-month outcomes and in the six months following the MOVE! start date for 12-month outcomes). Two recent VHA weight management evaluations guided the selection of the following medications as obesogenic (12,13): lithium, gabapentin, valproic acid, thioridazine, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, nefazodone, paroxetine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, desipramine, doxepin, imipramine, nortriptyline, and mirtazapine. MOVE! baseline weight was included, and to adjust for disease burden, the Charlson Comorbidity Index was calculated by summing the number of diagnoses for general medical conditions associated with at least one visit in the current or prior fiscal year.

SAS, version 9.3, was used for all analyses. Linear and logistic regression analyses identified associations of mental health status and outcomes. Veterans with intense and sustained participation and those with six- and 12-month weight data differed significantly from the general MOVE! sample across all baseline characteristics. We addressed this issue by adjusting for these characteristics in multivariate analyses.

Results

Participants differed significantly on all characteristics by mental health status (Table 1). [Multivariate regression analysis results of the association between participant characteristics and weight loss are available online as a data supplement to this report.] Adjusted analyses indicated that veterans with PTSD lost significantly less weight than veterans with no mental health diagnoses at six (mean±SE=–.72±.31 pounds, 95% confidence interval [CI]=−1.32 to –.12) and 12 (mean±SE=−1.01±.46 pounds, CI=−1.91 to –.11) months (p<.05). They were also less likely to lose 5% or more of body weight at six months (odds ratio=.89, CI=.79–.99, p<.05). At six months, participants with other mental conditions lost significantly less weight than participants with no mental health diagnoses (mean±SE=–.51±.25 pounds, CI=−1.01 to –.02, p<.05).

Table 1 Characteristics of 20,819 veterans with intense and sustained participation in MOVE! in fiscal years 2008–2012, by mental health statusa
Total (N=20,819)PTSD (N=4,589)Other mental health conditions (N=7,683)No mental health diagnoses (N=8,547)
VariableN%N%N%N%
Continuous
 Age59.8±10.157.8±9.857.9±9.962.4±9.8
 Charlson Comorbidity Index scoreb3.1±1.63.4±1.63.2±1.62.9±1.5
 Baseline weight247.6±51.6243.3±49.5247.7±52.6249.8±51.7
 Total weight loss (pounds)
  6 months6.8±13.15.7±13.06.3±13.77.9±12.4
  12 months6.7±16.95.3±16.06.2±17.67.9±16.5
Categorical
 Sex
  Male18,32788.03,97386.66,58985.87,76590.9
  Female2,49212.061613.41,09414.27829.1
 Race-ethnicity
  Non-Hispanic white14,64675.83,00068.85,43374.96,21380.7
  Non-Hispanic African American3,91120.31,12325.71,52421.01,26416.4
  Other7613.92395.53004.12222.9
 Marital status
  Married11,09954.02,53255.83,41945.05,14861.1
  Unmarried9,46546.02,00444.24,17955.03,28238.9
 Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom
  Yes7483.63627.91782.32082.4
  No20,07196.44,22792.17,50597.78,33997.6
 Service connection
  Yes11,76056.53,96286.33,93051.23,86845.3
  No9,05943.562713.73,75348.84,67954.7
 Psychotropic medication
  Yes4,23120.31,81739.62,03626.53784.4
  No16,58879.72,77260.45,64773.58,16995.6
 ≥5% weight loss
  6 months4,37626.487923.71,57425.61,92328.7
  12 months3,78628.584427.51,38528.01,55729.6

aAll bivariate associations between veterans’ characteristics and mental health status were significant (p<.001), except ≥5% weight loss at 12 months.

bScores reflect the total number of diagnoses for general medical conditions associated with at least one VHA visit in the current or prior fiscal year.

Table 1 Characteristics of 20,819 veterans with intense and sustained participation in MOVE! in fiscal years 2008–2012, by mental health statusa
Enlarge table

We reselected our sample so that those with alcohol dependence or abuse were not included in the “other mental health condition” category and performed interaction testing. This was done to examine whether alcohol misuse explained the differences in weight loss between those without mental health conditions and those with PTSD or other mental health conditions. The interactions were nonsignificant.

Discussion

Among veterans with intense and sustained MOVE! participation, those with PTSD experienced less weight loss than veterans with no mental health diagnoses, both at six and 12 months. Veterans with PTSD also experienced less weight loss than veterans with other mental conditions, but the differences were not statistically significant in adjusted analyses. In addition, at six months, veterans with other mental conditions lost less weight than those without a mental health diagnosis. Although differences between groups were generally small, there was a more substantial difference in the proportion of veterans with PTSD versus those without a mental health diagnosis who lost a clinically meaningful amount of weight at six months (23.7% versus 28.7%). However, this difference disappeared at 12 months. Whereas weight loss outcomes were poorer for veterans with any mental conditions, MOVE! appeared to be less effective for veterans with PTSD, and alcohol misuse did not explain this difference.

We do not know why veterans with PTSD and other mental conditions lost less weight than veterans without mental health diagnoses after intense and sustained participation in MOVE! Although there were sociodemographic and health status differences by mental health status, differences in weight loss among the three groups persisted in adjusted analyses. Moreover, the difference in weight loss cannot be explained by poorer participation because intense and sustained participation was equivalent across categories. In fact, the average number of MOVE! visits was lowest for veterans without mental health diagnoses (data not shown).

It is possible that the observed difference in weight loss was due to poor health behaviors among veterans with PTSD (6,7) and that core PTSD symptoms interfered with making behavioral changes needed to achieve weight loss. Such symptoms include behavioral and emotional avoidance, anhedonia, and sleep disturbance.

System-level factors may also play a role. In the VHA, mental conditions are primarily treated within specialty mental health clinics. Prior research has suggested that integrating health behavior change programs within mental health clinics may help to reduce disproportionate morbidity facing individuals with mental illness. For example, a recent review recommended integrated physical activity interventions for those with serious mental illness because mental health providers are best equipped to provide relevant reinforcement and address unique barriers to behavior change (14). Such interventions might also address psychological functioning, given the benefits of weight loss for patients with PTSD and depression (15).

Although these data have potential implications for VHA health care delivery, it is important to note that the findings may not generalize to other patient populations, including the general MOVE! participant population who did not have intense and sustained participation. Measures were derived from administrative data, so we were not able to examine the severity of PTSD and other psychiatric conditions or potential barriers to weight loss for those with PTSD and other mental conditions.

Conclusions

This evaluation introduces novel findings about MOVE!’s effectiveness for veterans with PTSD and other mental conditions who were engaged at an intense and sustained level. Future studies are needed to explore potential contributors to poorer outcomes for veterans with mental conditions and whether tailored weight management interventions are needed to help such veterans lose weight. Finally, few veterans, regardless of mental health status, had intense and sustained participation in MOVE! Thus although behavioral weight management interventions tailored for individuals with mental conditions may be warranted, increased efforts are also needed to enhance MOVE! participation broadly.

Dr. Hoerster, Dr. Littman, and Dr. Nelson are with the Seattle Division, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, where Dr. Hoerster is with the Mental Health Service, Dr. Littman is with the Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, and Dr. Nelson is with the Health Services Research & Development program (e-mail: ). They are also with the University of Washington, in Seattle, where Dr. Hoerster is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dr. Littman is with the Department of Epidemiology, and Dr. Nelson is with the Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine. Mr. Lai, Dr. Goodrich, Ms. Damschroder, and Dr. Kilbourne are with the VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Mr. Lai, Dr. Goodrich, and Dr. Kilbourne are also with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, also in Ann Arbor. Dr. Klingaman is with the VA Capitol Health Care Network Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, and with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, also in Baltimore. A poster containing preliminary findings from this study was presented at the Society of Behavioral Medicine annual meeting, San Francisco, March 20–23, 2013.

Acknowledgments and disclosures

This material is based on work supported by the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Funding for this evaluation came from Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI)–funded locally initiated project grants (QLP 55-017) provided by the VA Health Services Research & Development Diabetes and Mental Health QUERI Programs. Dr. Littman’s time was also supported by a VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Career Development Award (6982). Dr. Klingaman’s contributions were supported by the VA Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowship Program in Mental Illness Research and Treatment. This quality improvement evaluation was conducted at the request of the VA National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the VA.

The authors report no competing interests.

References

1 Dohrenwend BP, Turner JB, Turse NA, et al.: The psychological risks of Vietnam for US veterans: a revisit with new data and methods. Science 313:979–982, 2006Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Seal KH, Maguen S, Cohen B, et al.: VA mental health services utilization in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans in the first year of receiving new mental health diagnoses. Journal of Traumatic Stress 23:5–16, 2010MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Vasterling JJ, Proctor SP, Amoroso P, et al.: Neuropsychological outcomes of Army personnel following deployment to the Iraq war. JAMA 296:519–529, 2006Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Dedert EA, Calhoun PS, Watkins LL, et al.: Posttraumatic stress disorder, cardiovascular, and metabolic disease: a review of the evidence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 39:61–78, 2010Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Rheingold AA, Acierno R, Resnick HS: Trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, and health risk behaviors; in Trauma and Health: Physical Health Consequences of Exposure to Extreme Stress. Edited by Schnurr PP, Green BL. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2004CrossrefGoogle Scholar

6 Chwastiak LA, Rosenheck RA, Kazis LE: Association of psychiatric illness and obesity, physical inactivity, and smoking among a national sample of veterans. Psychosomatics 52:230–236, 2011Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Talbot LS, Maguen S, Epel ES, et al.: Posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with emotional eating. Journal of Traumatic Stress 26:521–525, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Kahwati LC, Lance TX, Jones KR, et al.: RE-AIM evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration’s MOVE! weight management program. Translational Behavioral Medicine 1:551–560, 2011Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Van Gaal LF, Wauters MA, De Leeuw IH: The beneficial effects of modest weight loss on cardiovascular risk factors. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 21(suppl 1):S5–S9, 1997MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Littman AJ, Boyko EJ, McDonell MB, et al.: Evaluation of a weight management program for veterans. Preventing Chronic Disease 9:E99, 2012MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Maguen S, Madden E, Cohen B, et al.: The relationship between body mass index and mental health among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. Journal of General Internal Medicine 28(suppl 2):S563–S570, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Del Re AC, Maciejewski ML, Harris AH: MOVE: weight management program across the Veterans Health Administration: patient- and facility-level predictors of utilization. BMC Health Services Research 13:511, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Copeland LA, Pugh MJ, Hicks PB, et al.: Use of obesity-related care by psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Services 63:230–236, 2012LinkGoogle Scholar

14 Richardson CR, Faulkner G, McDevitt J, et al.: Integrating physical activity into mental health services for persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 56:324–331, 2005LinkGoogle Scholar

15 Johannessen KB, Berntsen D: Losing the symptoms: weight loss and decrease in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychology 69:655–660, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar