The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Brief ReportsFull Access

Potentially Preventable Medical Hospitalizations Among Maryland Residents With Mental Illness, 2005–2010

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300323

Abstract

Objective

The goal of this study was to assess the association between mental illness and potentially preventable ambulatory care–sensitive (ACS) hospitalizations among children, adults, and older adults.

Methods

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study that used 2005–2010 Maryland hospital discharge data (N=508,142 hospitalizations). Logistic regression was used to assess the associations between mental illness and ACS hospitalizations.

Results

Any mental illness diagnosis was associated with heightened odds of ACS hospitalization in all three age groups. Any mental illness diagnosis was associated with 84% higher odds of ACS hospitalization among children, 32% higher odds of ACS hospitalization among adults, and 30% higher odds of ACS hospitalization among older adults.

Conclusions

Mental illness was associated with increased odds of ACS hospitalization across the life span. Future research should examine the potential for integrated medical and behavioral health care models to address the poorly controlled somatic conditions that lead to ACS hospitalizations among persons with mental illness.

Prevalence of somatic conditions, particularly cardiovascular disease, is heightened among persons with mental illness (1). Conditions like diabetes are often poorly controlled in this population (2), and some studies suggest that one important reason is poor access to and quality of somatic health care (2,3).

Ambulatory care–sensitive (ACS) hospitalizations are commonly used indicators of poor access to or poor quality of primary health care systems (4,5). The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) defines hospitalizations for 14 conditions among adults and five conditions among children as ACS hospitalizations (4). Hospitalizations that may be prevented by timely access to effective outpatient care—for example, hospitalizations for diabetes—are considered ACS hospitalizations (4).

High prevalence and poor control of somatic conditions may place persons with mental illness at increased odds of ACS hospitalization. Two prior studies found that mental illness was associated with increased likelihood of ACS hospitalizations among U.S. adults (6,7). One study of older adults showed similar results but was limited to Medicare beneficiaries with comorbid depression and chronic medical illness (8). To our knowledge, no U.S. study has examined the association between mental illness and ACS hospitalizations among children or older adults with diagnoses other than depression.

To address this gap in the literature, we conducted a study assessing the relationship between mental illness and ACS hospitalizations among Maryland children, adults, and older adults. Using hospital discharge data, we assessed the association between secondary discharge diagnoses of mental illness and primary discharge diagnoses indicating ACS or non-ACS (or “marker”) hospitalizations. Because of differences in burden of somatic conditions and variation in type, severity, and duration of mental illnesses across the life span, the relationship between mental illness and ACS hospitalizations could differ by age. Given efforts to integrate delivery of somatic and behavioral health care to address the high burden of somatic conditions and prevent costly hospitalizations in this population (9), it is important to understand the relationship between mental illness and ACS hospitalizations across the life span.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using 2005–2010 Maryland hospital discharge data. Because ACS hospitalizations are relatively rare among children, six years of data were used to ensure sufficient sample size and assess associations between mental illness and ACS hospitalizations in this age group. The data set included all discharges from acute care hospitals in Maryland. In accordance with Li and colleagues (6) and Cahoon and colleagues (7), the independent variable was secondary diagnosis of mental illness, defined as diagnoses with ICD-9-CM codes 295–302, 306–309, and 311–314. The dependent variable was a dichotomous indicator of any ACS hospitalization, defined per the AHRQ algorithm and calculated with the primary discharge diagnosis (4). The ICD-9-CM codes used to identify these diagnoses are available from AHRQ (4).

Following Billings and colleagues (10) and Li and colleagues (6), we compared ACS hospitalizations with “marker” hospitalizations. In direct contrast to ACS hospitalizations, marker hospitalizations were defined as hospitalizations for acute conditions unlikely to be prevented by outpatient care. For adults, marker hospitalizations included hospitalizations with primary discharge diagnoses of appendicitis with appendectomy (ICD-9-CM codes 540–542, with Current Procedural Terminology code 44950, 44955, or 44960), acute myocardial infarction (ICD-9-CM code 410), gastrointestinal obstruction (ICD-9-CM code 560), and fracture of the hip or femur (ICD-9-CM code 820). Because acute myocardial infarction and hip fractures are rare among children, we defined marker hospitalizations for children as hospitalizations with a primary discharge diagnosis of appendicitis with appendectomy, as well as gastrointestinal obstruction and any acute fracture (ICD-9-CM codes 800–829).

Logistic regression with hospital-specific fixed effects and robust variance estimation was used to evaluate the associations between mental illness and ACS hospitalizations. Hospitalization was the unit of analysis. Standard errors were clustered by hospital. Models assessed whether any mental illness, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, and anxiety were associated with ACS hospitalizations. Model covariates included age, sex, race, marital status (adults only), primary payer (Medicaid, Medicare, private insurance, other, and uninsured), length of hospital stay, and 16 medical comorbidities, defined with the Clinical Classifications Software. This study was deemed exempt from review by the institutional review board at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Results

Our analysis included 11,009 hospitalizations (6,314 ACS, 4,695 marker) of children ages ten to 17, 226,044 hospitalizations (189,242 ACS, 36,802 marker) of adults aged 18–64, and 271,089 hospitalizations (210,924 ACS, 60,165 marker) of older adults aged ≥65. Twelve percent of hospitalizations of children involved a secondary diagnosis of any mental illness (<1% schizophrenia, 1.3% bipolar disorder, 2.7% depression, and 2.0% anxiety). Twenty-two percent of hospitalizations of adults aged 18–64 involved a secondary diagnosis of any mental illness (1.7% schizophrenia, 3.7% bipolar disorder, 12.7% depression, and 8.9% anxiety). Nineteen percent of hospitalizations of older adults involved a secondary diagnosis of mental illness (<1% schizophrenia, 1.0% bipolar disorder, 12.2% depression, and 8.4% anxiety).

Regression results are presented in Table 1. In all three age groups, mental illness was associated with increased odds of ACS hospitalization. Among children, any mental illness (odds ratio [OR]=1.84), depression (OR=2.84), and anxiety (OR=2.17) were associated with higher odds of ACS hospitalization. Among adults and older adults, all mental illness diagnoses studied were associated with heightened odds of ACS hospitalization. Overall, mental illness was associated with 32% higher odds of ACS hospitalization among adults aged 18–64 and 30% higher odds of ACS hospitalization among older adults aged ≥65.

Table 1 Association between mental illness and 508,142 ambulatory care–sensitive (ACS) hospitalizations in Maryland, by age group, 2005–2010a
Any ACS hospitalizationb
DiagnosisNOR95% CIp
Children (age 10–17)c11,009
 Any mental illness1.841.40–2.40<.001
 Schizophrenia3.52.66–18.8.140
 Bipolar disorder.63.55–1.59.806
 Depression2.842.14–3.75<.001
 Anxiety2.171.50–3.15<.001
Adults (age 18–64)d226,044
 Any mental illness1.321.25–1.39<.001
 Schizophrenia1.241.06–1.45.006
 Bipolar disorder1.331.22–1.45<.001
 Depression1.301.23–1.37<.001
 Anxiety1.311.21–1.41<.001
Older adults (age ≥65)d271,089
 Any mental illness1.301.25–1.37<.001
 Schizophrenia1.201.02–1.41.024
 Bipolar disorder1.511.35–1.70<.001
 Depression1.261.19–1.34<.001
 Anxiety1.351.27–1.43<.001

a Models controlled for the covariates age, sex, race, marital status (adult models only), primary payer (Medicaid, Medicare, private insurance, self-pay, or no insurance), and length of hospital stay in days and the medical comorbidities substance use disorder, valvular disease, pulmonary circulation disease, peripheral vascular disease, paralysis, hypothyroidism, renal failure, liver disease, lymphoma, metastatic cancer, solid tumor without metastasis, rheumatoid arthritis, coagulopathy, obesity, fluid and electrolyte disorders, and anemia.

b For adults, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) defines ACS hospitalizations as those involving primary diagnoses of diabetes with short-term complications, perforated appendix, diabetes with long-term complications, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma among older adults, hypertension, congestive heart failure, dehydration, bacterial pneumonia, urinary tract infection, angina without procedure, uncontrolled diabetes, asthma among younger adults, and lower-extremity amputation among patients with diabetes. For children, AHRQ defines ACS hospitalizations as those involving primary diagnoses of asthma, diabetes, gastroenteritis, urinary tract infection, and perforated appendix.

c Odds of ACS hospitalization were compared with odds of hospitalization for a marker condition, including appendicitis with appendectomy, gastrointestinal obstruction, and any acute fracture (excluding stress fractures).

d Odds of ACS hospitalization were compared with odds of hospitalization for a marker condition, including appendicitis with appendectomy, acute myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal obstruction, and fracture of the hip or femur.

Table 1 Association between mental illness and 508,142 ambulatory care–sensitive (ACS) hospitalizations in Maryland, by age group, 2005–2010a
Enlarge table

Discussion

Consistent with prior studies among adults (6,7), we found that mental illness was associated with increased odds of ACS hospitalization across the life span. Although our descriptive study cannot determine the causes of this relationship, prior research suggests that patient, physician, social, and health system factors contribute to ACS hospitalizations (11). Among people with mental illness, the high prevalence of somatic conditions (1), cognitive impairment (12), communication difficulties (12), poor social support (12), and physician misperceptions of physical complaints as psychosomatic (13) may lead to ACS hospitalizations. In addition, health system factors may make it difficult to manage the somatic conditions that, when poorly controlled, lead to ACS hospitalizations. Low primary care physician supply has been associated with increased rates of ACS hospitalizations in urban areas (5), and fragmented delivery of somatic and behavioral health care may result in poor access, quality, or continuity of somatic medical care in the population with mental illness (9).

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) includes several initiatives that may help to address these health system barriers by integrating financing and delivery of somatic and behavioral health care. ACA initiatives that could help improve control of somatic conditions among persons with mental illness include Medicaid health homes (9), integrated care demonstration projects for persons dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid (9), and accountable care organizations (14). In addition, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration is funding integrated delivery of primary and behavioral health care at multiple sites (9). It is important to include ACS hospitalizations in the performance metrics used to evaluate many of these initiatives (15). Our study findings suggest that preventing ACS hospitalizations is an important goal for all age groups with mental illness.

Our study had several important limitations. A primary limitation is that our analysis did not identify the causes underlying the relationship between mental illness and ACS hospitalizations. Because the hospital discharge data lacked person-level identifiers, we were unable to account for clustering of hospitalizations per individual. Marker conditions have not been validated for children. Measures of severity and health behaviors were not available in hospital discharge data, and measurement error resulting from unreported diagnoses of mental illness or ACS indicators may bias results. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show an association between mental illness and increased odds of ACS hospitalizations among children as well as adults.

Conclusions

Mental illness was associated in this study with increased odds of ACS hospitalizations across the life span. Future research should examine the potential for integrated general medical and behavioral health care models to address the poorly controlled somatic medical conditions that lead to ACS hospitalizations among persons with mental illness.

Dr. McGinty is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (e-mail: ). Dr. Sridhara is with the Maryland Health Care Commission, Baltimore.

Acknowledgments and disclosures

Dr. McGinty gratefully acknowledges the Maryland Health Care Commission Health Disparities Research Fellowship, which funded this work. The authors acknowledge the contributions of Bruce Kozlowski, B.S., S.E.F.

The authors report no competing interests.

References

1 Druss BG, Walker ER: Mental Disorders and Medical Comorbidity. Princeton, NJ, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2011Google Scholar

2 Kreyenbuhl J, Dickerson FB, Medoff DR, et al.: Extent and management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and serious mental illness. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 194:404–410, 2006Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Druss BG, Rosenheck RA: Mental disorders and access to medical care in the United States. American Journal of Psychiatry 155:1775–1776, 1998LinkGoogle Scholar

4 Prevention Quality Indicators Overview. Rockville, Md, US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Jan 25, 2011. Available at www.qualityindicators.ahrq.govGoogle Scholar

5 Laditka JN, Laditka SB, Probst JC: More may be better: evidence of a negative relationship between physician supply and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Health Services Research 40:1148–1166, 2005Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Li Y, Glance LG, Cai X, et al.: Mental illness and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive medical conditions. Medical Care 46:1249–1256, 2008Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Cahoon EK, McGinty EE, Ford DE, et al.: Schizophrenia and potentially preventable hospitalizations in the United States: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 13:37, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Himelhoch S, Weller WE, Wu AW, et al.: Chronic medical illness, depression, and use of acute medical services among Medicare beneficiaries. Medical Care 42:512–521, 2004Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Druss BG, Mauer BJ: Health care reform and care at the behavioral health–primary care interface. Psychiatric Services 61:1087–1092, 2010LinkGoogle Scholar

10 Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J, et al.: Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Affairs 12(1):162–173, 1993CrossrefGoogle Scholar

11 Freund T, Campbell SM, Geissler S, et al.: Strategies for reducing potentially avoidable hospitalizations for ambulatory care–sensitive conditions. Annals of Family Medicine 11:363–370, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Mueser KT, McGurk SR: Schizophrenia. Lancet 363:2063–2072, 2004Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Graber MA, Bergus G, Dawson JD, et al.: Effect of a patient’s psychiatric history on physicians’ estimation of probability of disease. Journal of General Internal Medicine 15:204–206, 2000Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14 Barry CL, Huskamp HA: Moving beyond parity: mental health and addiction care under the ACA. New England Journal of Medicine 365:973–975, 2011Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15 Quality Measures and Performance Standards: 2013 ACO Quality Documents. Baltimore, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2013. Available at www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Quality_Measures_Standards.htmlGoogle Scholar