The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Brief ReportsFull Access

Prevalence and Correlates of Urinary Incontinence in a Large Cohort of Psychiatric Inpatients

Published Online:

Abstract

Objective:

Urinary incontinence is physically and psychologically disabling, and little information exists about this condition in psychiatric populations. This exploratory study examined the prevalence of urinary incontinence and factors associated with this condition among persons with mental illness in three age groups: under 45, 45–64, and 65 and older.

Methods:

Data were from the Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health. Population-level data on adult inpatient psychiatric admissions (N=41,004) in Ontario, Canada, between October 2005 and June 2007 were analyzed.

Results:

The prevalence of urinary incontinence was 6.2%, with higher rates among women and with increasing age. Across age groups, common treatable factors were found, including diarrhea, poorer cognitive and physical functioning, and use of chair restraint.

Conclusions:

Urinary incontinence was relatively common among psychiatric inpatients and associated with a number of treatable conditions. When it is assessed early during an admission and appropriate treatment measures are implemented, time in the hospital may decrease. (Psychiatric Services 62:97–100, 2011)

Urinary incontinence is a common and disabling condition among community-dwelling (1) and institutionalized (2) persons, with prevalence rates of 3% to 60% (3), which increase with age (4). Costs associated with incontinence are significant (5), and the condition is an independent risk factor for institutionalization (6). Although there is an extensive database on urinary incontinence in the general and institutionalized aged populations, little information exists for younger cohorts or those with mental illnesses.

Most related studies among persons with mental illness have focused on women, small samples, certain medical conditions, and medications. Furthermore, previous work has shown that urinary incontinence does not figure prominently in the person's care plan and is not perceived as being an important clinical concern in inpatient psychiatry (7). This exploratory study examined factors associated with urinary incontinence by using population-level data for persons admitted to inpatient psychiatric care in Ontario, Canada. It also examined differences in these factors by age group.

Methods

In 2005 the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care mandated the use of the Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health (RAI-MH) in adult inpatient psychiatric facilities. The ministry also required submission of data to the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Ontario Mental Health Reporting System. This study analyzed admission data for 41,004 individuals assessed between October 2005 and June 2007. Ethics approval for secondary analyses of deidentified data was provided by the University of Waterloo Office of Research.

The RAI-MH is a comprehensive assessment instrument that is completed within the first three days of admission to an inpatient psychiatric facility (8). Its 400 items evaluate status in key domains, including mental state, substance use, risk of harm to self and others, behavior disturbance, role functioning, social engagement and support, stressors, cognitive performance, self-care skills, communication, physical health, medications, and service utilization. The assessment is completed in about one hour by trained clinical staff. A detailed manual is available (9). Psychometric properties of the RAI-MH have been reported elsewhere (10).

The RAI-MH assesses bladder continence over the past three days with an item that uses a 7-point scale: 0, continent; 1, control with a catheter; 2, infrequent incontinence; 3, episode of incontinence; 4, occasionally incontinent; 5, frequently incontinent; and 6, incontinent. For this study, urinary incontinence was defined as any instance of incontinence—that is, a score of 1–6.

RAI-MH items used in this study include age; sex; psychiatric diagnoses; presence of an intellectual disability; self-rated health; dizziness, vertigo, or light-headedness; dry mouth; difficulty urinating or polyuria; flat or blunted affect; sleep problems; easily distracted; periods of altered perception; history of sexual, physical, or emotional abuse; electroconvulsive therapy or chair restraint; medication adherence; psychotropic medications stopped because of side effects; and intentional medication misuse. Validated scales that are embedded in the RAI-MH were also used; these scales are related to depression (11), positive psychotic symptoms (7), anhedonia (7), pain (12), health instability (13), cognition (14), and self-care (15).

All analyses were performed with SAS, version 9.1. Before multivariate logistic regression models were developed, collinearity was assessed. To determine which factors were independently associated with urinary incontinence, unconditional multivariate logistic regression was performed for each age group. Only statistically significant (p<.05) findings are reported.

Results

Overall, patients were in their mid-forties (mean±SD age=44.6±16.8). Most were male (51.2%, N=20,983) and occupied acute care beds (81.6%, N=33,449). Primary provisional psychiatric diagnoses included mood disorders (41.6%, N=16,546), psychotic disorders (31.6%, N=12,538), substance use disorders (14.5%, N=5,746), delirium or dementia (4.7%, N=1,861), and anxiety disorders (3.0%, N=1,186).

The overall prevalence of urinary incontinence was 6.2% (N=2,547). Prevalence was higher among women (6.8% of women, N=1,358, and 5.7% of men, N=1,189; p<.001) and among older adults (under age 45, 2.0%, N=451; aged 45–64, 5.9%, N=789; and aged 65 and older, 25.2%, N=1,307; p<.001). A significant age-sex interaction was found: women had higher rates of incontinence than men before age 65 (under age 45, 2.4% versus 1.7%, p=.001; and aged 45–64, 6.6% versus 5.1%, p<.001) and lower rates than men at age 65 and older (22.1% versus 29.4%, p<.001).

Table 1 shows the significant results of the multivariate analyses for the three age groups. Some variables had positive associations with incontinence for all age groups, including urinary problems, diarrhea, cognitive impairment, functional impairment, and chair restraint. In the two younger age groups, problems chewing or swallowing, polydipsia, and a primary provisional diagnosis of a disorder of childhood or adolescence or an impulse control disorder were positively associated with incontinence.

Variables that were associated with incontinence only among patients under age 45 included a primary provisional diagnosis of dissociative disorder and of a psychiatric illness resulting from a general medical disorder. Although a primary provisional diagnosis of a psychotic disorder was not significantly associated with incontinence in this age group, presence of positive psychotic symptoms was. Having an intellectual disability and increasing age (within this age group) were also positively associated with incontinence. A primary provisional diagnosis of a substance use disorder was associated with decreased odds of incontinence among those under age 45.

Among patients aged 45–64, a primary provisional diagnosis of delirium or dementia more than doubled the risk of incontinence, whereas being adherent to medications less than 80% of the time and having a decreased food intake reduced the risk.

For patients aged 65 and older, an increased risk of incontinence was associated with drowsiness, daily pain, and sleep problems, whereas dizziness, intentional misuse of medications, insufficient fluid intake, a primary provisional diagnosis of a mood disorder, health complaints, and being easily distracted decreased the risk.

Discussion

This is the first large-scale investigation of urinary incontinence that examined both prevalence and factors independently associated with this condition among psychiatric inpatients. A prevalence of 6.2% was found, and although incontinence was more common among older adults, it was still a problem for younger patients. Furthermore, findings suggest that several factors amenable to intervention were positively associated with urinary incontinence across the three age groups, including diarrhea, poorer cognitive and physical functioning, and use of chair restraint.

This study is not without limitations. First, the cross-sectional nature of the data limits our understanding of the direction of the effects. Second, the lack of information on general medical conditions and specific medications used prevented us from examining potential causes of incontinence. Although the RAI-MH documents medical diagnoses and the medications that patients are taking, inclusion of this information in the national database had not been mandated at the time of this study. Some of the significant factors that we identified, such as intellectual disability or dementia, may not have been significant in multivariate models that included information on medications. Therefore, findings reported need to be put into the context of general medical comorbidity, because we were unable to control for that. However, it is expected that such data will be available in the future. Third, lack of detail about the type of urinary incontinence and corresponding symptoms limits understanding of the issue.

Conclusions

Urinary incontinence is an abnormal condition—not a normal part of aging or an expected condition among psychiatric patients—and the prevalence rate found in this study is higher than some might have imagined. Future work is needed that examines the extent to which urinary incontinence persists beyond hospital admission and how general medical diagnoses and medications alter the relationships reported here.

Dr. Rabinowitz is affiliated with the Departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine and Fletcher Allen Health Care, 111 Colchester Ave., Burlington, VT 05401-1473 (e-mail: ).
Dr. Martin is with the Master of Public Health Program, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Ms. Montague is with Custom Analytica, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Dr. Hirdes is with the Department of Health Research and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, and Homewood Research Institute, Guelph.

Acknowledgments and disclosures

The authors report no competing interests.

References

1 Maggi S , Minicuci N , Langlois J , et al.: Prevalence rate of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling elderly individuals: the Veneto study. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 56:M14–M18, 2001 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Aggazzotti G , Pesce F , Grassi D , et al.: Prevalence of urinary incontinence among institutionalized patients: a cross-sectional epidemiologic study in a midsized city in northern Italy. Urology 56:245–249, 2000 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Minassian VA , Drutz HP , Al-Badr A : Urinary incontinence as a worldwide problem. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 82:327–338, 2003 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Dubeau CE : The aging lower urinary tract. Journal of Urology 175:S11–S15, 2006 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Wilson L , Brown JS , Shin GP , et al.: Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence. Obstetrics and Gynecology 98:398–406, 2001 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Andel R , Hyer K , Slack A : Risk factors for nursing home placement in older adults with and without dementia. Journal of Aging and Health 19:213–228, 2007 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Hirdes JP , Smith TF , Pérez E , et al.: Enhancing the Use of InterRAI Instruments in Mental Health: Making an Integrated Health Information System Happen. Ottawa, Government of Canada, Primary Health Care Transition Fund, 2005 Google Scholar

8 Hirdes JP , Marhaba M , Smith TF , et al.: Development of the Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health (RAI-MH). Hospital Quarterly 4:44–51, 2002 Google Scholar

9 Hirdes JP , Pérez E , Curtin-Telegdi N , et al.: RAI-MH Training Manual and Resource Guide, Version 2. Toronto, Ontario, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and Ontario Hospital Association, Ontario Joint Policy and Planning Committee, 2003 Google Scholar

10 Hirdes JP , Smith TF , Rabinowitz T , et al.: The Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health (RAI-MH): inter-rater reliability and convergent validity. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 29:419–432, 2002 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Burrows AB , Morris JN , Simon SE , et al.: Development of a minimum data set-based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes. Age and Ageing 29:165–172, 2000 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Fries BE , Simon SE , Morris JN , et al.: Pain in US nursing homes: validating a pain scale for the minimum data set. Gerontologist 41:173–179, 2001 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Hirdes JP , Frijters DH , Teare GF : The MDS-CHESS scale: a new measure to predict mortality in institutionalized older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 51:96–100, 2003 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14 Morris JN , Fries BE , Mehr DR , et al.: MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. Journal of Gerontology 49:174–182, 1994 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

15 Morris J , Fries B , Morris S : Scaling the ADLs within the MDS. Journals of Gerontology Series A:Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 54:M546–M553, 1999 Google Scholar

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Table 1 Significant results from multivariable logistic regression models of potential predictors of urinary incontinence among adult psychiatric inpatients, by age group