The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Characteristics of participants in a supported education program for adults with psychiatric disabilities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.47.12.1371

OBJECTIVE: Supported education programs provide assistance, preparation, and support to individuals with psychiatric disabilities who desire to pursue postsecondary education. To determine the extent to which "typical" clients with severe mental illness can participate in a supported education program, the study examined characteristics of participants in a large supported education program. METHODS: Baseline interviews with participants in a supported education program in the metropolitan Detroit area gathered demographic data, as well as information about school, work, and psychiatric history; social adjustment and support; psychiatric symptoms; and self-perceptions in the areas of school efficacy and self-esteem. Cluster analysis used five variables (sex, age, educational attainment, work background, and symptoms) to produce a client typology. RESULTS: Five clusters emerged: well-functioning young men, young aspiring women, young dependent men, well-functioning but unemployed participants, and distressed unemployed participants. The clusters also differed on a large number of variables not used in the cluster analysis. However, members of all clusters had similar rates of program participation and first-semester attendance. Overall, the supported education participants were younger, better educated, and higher functioning than subjects in general samples of persons with severe mental illness. Although many participants had significant problems with symptoms, social adjustment, and substance abuse, they were able to remain active program participants. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that supported education is a feasible alternative for many individuals to meet goals for educational advancement, personal development, and better jobs.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.