The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.8.761

Rochester mental health providers and planners are convinced that capitation is an effective financing mechanism that allows care to be tailored to the needs of the individual and that can drive development of needed services. Some of the problems encountered involved the stability of the financing mechanism, new assumption of costs not previously borne by mental health dollars, the appropriateness of stop-loss mechanisms, methods of incorporating Medicaid and Medicare funds, and definition of capitation rate groups as well as parameters for movement in and out of groups.

Many of the contractual and administrative obstacles would be ameliorated if mechanisms were available at higher levels of government to allow for capitation financing and incorporation of other financing and reimbursement sources. The clinical benefits of capitation in Rochester were most demonstrable in the development of systems of care targeted to persons with serious and persistent mental illness and the transfer of care to the community for most of these persons. Whether capitation programs provide incentives for underserving enrollees was not really adequately tested in this demonstration project, as the capitation rates were generally adequate to support the needed care.

The question has been asked whether we would implement another capitation program if given the opportunity. The answer is a resounding "You bet!"

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.