" Anyplace but the State Hospital": Examining Assumptions About the Benefits of Admission Diversion
Abstract
One function of contemporary psychiatric emergency services is to divert patient admissions from state hospitals. Underlying this mandate are a series of untested assumptions about the positive effects of admission diversion. The author examines these assumptions using data on inpatient admissions from a crisis intervention service. Although the service was successful in preventing first admissions to the state hospital, the rate of recidivist admissions increased. Inpatient treatment in general or private hospitals did not result in shorter lengths of stay orfewer bed days than state hospital treatment. Because patients could be sent to any of several hospitals, some located far from the catchment area, continuity of care and treatment in the local community were not advanced by diverting admissions from the state hospital.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
