The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.41.6.649

It is difficult to make a summary statement about a diverse group of papers. However, some of the papers tangentially reflect a current phenomenon that deserves attention: a growing tendency to view case management as the magical solution to the problems faced by persons with severe and persistent mental illness, with the consequent minimization of the importance of professional expertise.

The needs of persons with severe and persistent mental illness are many and complex. Adequate care for such persons requires the collaboration and close personal involvement of well-trained professionals from various disciplines, and well-trained paraprofessionals. The Madison model serves as one vehicle for providing such care. It is not a case management program, treatment program, on rehabilitation program; rather, it is a care program that makes use of well-trained professionals and paraprofessionals who together provide treatment, rehabilitation, and case management services.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.