Mental Illness Services in Britain: Counting the Costs, Weighing the Benefits
Abstract
The evidence accumulating from these recent careful studies suggests that care in the community is likely to be less expensive and more beneficial than institution-based care for many people with chronic mental illness. The cost savings are likely to be greater for less severely disabled individuals. These findings are consistent with those of earlier studies conducted in the United States (5) and in Australia (6).
The incorporation of cost-benefit analysis into the daily routine of service provision presents a major opportunity for using limited resources in a way that maximizes the benefit to patients. Clinical staff readily recognize the importance of balancing the costs and benefits of the services they provide. Their reservations and skepticism about cost-benefit analysis usually center on doubts about the reliability and validity of the means used to calculate the costs and benefits. Involving clinicians in developing measures of outcome offers an opportunity to secure their commitment to the value of cost-benefit analysis.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
