The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.36.9.993

Psychosocial rehabilitation programs are known for their pragmatism and flexibility. They have tackled the problem of recidivism by borrowing techniques from successful programs (regardless of theoretical orientation), relying on trial and error or clinical hunches, and utilizing the findings of internal program evaluations. The proliferation of newer psychosocial technologies and the increased recidivism of the past decade suggest a need to reevaluate existing programs. We need to examine what methods work with particular clients in order to provide a continuum of care for a heterogeneous client population.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.