The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.31.5.328

Lower salary costs and effective provision of services to specific community groups are counted among the advantages of the use of mental health workers in community programs. In a cost-benefit analysis of the value of health manpower, salaries and service provision are only two of several factors, yet the circumstances of funding, training, and role diffusion that surround the use of the mental health worker have precluded true cost-benefit analysis. The authors believe that the mental health worker program of the Orange County, California, community mental health program is developed and stable enough that the initial steps of an economic analysis are possible. The data from the analysis show that, in the outpatient program, mental health workers constitute 37 per cent of the clinical staff and provide 41 per cent of the direct services, yet account for 26 per cent of the direct personnel costs.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.