The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
LettersFull Access

Why Is There a Link Between Smoking and Suicide?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.660301

To the Editor: The association between smoking and suicide is controversial, because it is unclear whether smoking influences suicide through a biological effect of smoking itself or whether there is a form of reverse causation whereby depression both makes quitting smoking more difficult and increases suicide risk. In the February issue, Balbuena and Tempier (1) reported a case-control study in which suicide decedents were compared with a control group of persons who died from accidents or homicide. This is a powerful approach that may reduce confounding (by factors related to both suicide and to mortality from accidents or homicide). The influence of proxy reporting of behaviors should be similar for both the case and the control groups.

However, it has previously been shown that smoking is related in a similar way to the risk of homicide and to the risk of suicide (2), an observation that casts doubt on a biological effect of smoking on suicide itself. Balbuena and Tempier did not report the data in such a way that the differences in smoking between the homicide and accident decedents can be easily seen. In Table 1, it is stated that the zero category for duration of smoking abstinence denotes current smokers. However, it clearly does not do so from the numbers presented, and thus it is not possible to analyze the “ever smoker” versus “never smoker” associations. Furthermore, the age differences between the homicide and accident decedents could obscure findings. However, the presented data suggest that homicide decedents were more likely to be smokers than accident decedents. It would be useful if Balbuena and Tempier would report these analyses in an unambiguous way.

In their discussion, Balbuena and Tempier refer to an improvement of mood with abstinence from smoking and a difference in depression levels between successful quitters and those who are unsuccessful, and the authors suggest that this supports a causal interpretation. However, the evidence is not convincing in this regard. Application of the principle of Mendelian randomization (3) to studies has failed to provide evidence that smoking causes depression (4,5). It would be curious if smoking cessation led to a genuine reduction in depression levels unless smoking had itself contributed to increased depression levels. Given a lack of evidence for the latter, we are therefore left with the more parsimonious explanation that the relationship between smoking cessation and reduction in depression levels is the result of reverse causation. Together with confounding this could account for the smoking and suicide link, as previously discussed (2).

The authors are with the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. Prof. Davey Smith is also with the School of Social and Community Medicine, and Prof. Munafo is also with the School of Experimental Psychology, both at the University of Bristol.
References

1 Balbuena L, Tempier R: Independent association of chronic smoking and abstinence with suicide. Psychiatric Services 66:186–192, 2015LinkGoogle Scholar

2 Davey Smith G, Phillips AN, Neaton JD: Smoking as “independent” risk factor for suicide: illustration of an artifact from observational epidemiology? Lancet 340:709–712, 1992Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S: “Mendelian randomization”: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? International Journal of Epidemiology 32:1–22, 2003Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Taylor AE, Fluharty ME, Bjørngaard JH, et al.: Investigating the possible causal association of smoking with depression and anxiety using Mendelian randomization meta-analysis: the CARTA consortium. British Medical Journal, 2014 (doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006141)Google Scholar

5 Bjørngaard JH, Gunnell D, Elvestad MB, et al.: The causal role of smoking in anxiety and depression: a Mendelian randomization analysis of the HUNT study. Psychological Medicine 43:711–719, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar