The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Promoting High-Value Mental Health CareFull Access

Coaching Into Care: Veterans Affairs Telephone-Based Service for Concerned Family Members of Military Veterans

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201900113

Abstract

Many veterans who need mental health treatment are reluctant to seek care, and their family members often do not know how to encourage them to do so. In 2011, a telephone-based service called Coaching Into Care (CIC) was developed to address this concern. Callers are provided with educational resources and referrals; in more complicated cases, callers are provided with up to 6 months of telephone-based coaching. This coaching of family members has been associated with an increase in veterans accessing mental health care. This program may serve as a model for community efforts to engage individuals in needed mental health care.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Coaching Into Care (CIC) is a national telephone service of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs that helps family members concerned about the mental health of a veteran to encourage the veteran to seek treatment.

  • Program evaluation suggests that CIC is a feasible and effective method to assist family members of veterans in encouraging veterans to access mental health services.

  • CIC may serve as a model for community efforts to assist families in helping their loved ones who have mental health challenges to engage in appropriate care.

The military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have focused policy makers and clinicians within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on efforts to engage veterans in the VA health care system. Although there has been some success in enrolling veterans in the VA health care system (1), a significant percentage of veterans from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are reluctant to participate in mental health or substance abuse treatment, even when they may be experiencing distressing symptoms. Untreated mental health problems among veterans is a risk factor for veteran suicide, which remains at higher rates than corresponding civilian rates (2).

Military veterans do not seek mental health care for various reasons: belief that treatment is not helpful or could worsen symptoms (3, 4); stigma associated with seeking mental health services (4); lack of knowledge about mental health conditions (3); logistical issues, such as lack of transportation to distant VA facilities (3); and inability to get time off from work (4). Close loved ones are often aware of veterans’ struggles and, if provided with the skills to do so, can encourage the veteran to access care (5). An effective method is needed to leverage the concerns of veterans’ loved ones to encourage and facilitate veterans’ efforts to seek mental health treatment.

Coaching Into Care (CIC) is a telephone-based service developed by VA to work with concerned family members and friends of veterans who are reluctant to initiate mental health care. The program helps these callers to be more effective in supporting veterans in the decision to seek care by using procedures similar to other telephone-based coaching approaches (6) and similar to face-to-face interventions for relatives seeking help for a family member with substance abuse problems (7). CIC was designed as a service for close friends and family members, rather than for veterans, to complement other VA efforts directed primarily to veterans (e.g., the “Choose VA” campaign). Involving family members and others close to veterans is consistent with many veterans’ preferences for their care (8, 9).

Implementation and Evaluation of CIC

CIC was initiated as a nationally available service in June 2011. Staff are based in VA medical centers in Philadelphia; Durham, North Carolina; and Los Angeles. CIC operates as a core service funded by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). One toll-free number is used to distribute incoming calls to staff at one of the three sites. Two levels of intervention are provided to callers: provision of basic information, education, and referrals by a call responder with a bachelor’s degree and a higher level of intervention, called coaching, typically provided by a licensed mental health provider. Coaching involves multiple telephone contacts with callers whose presenting situation involves more than a request for information or who report situations carrying high clinical risk. The goal of the coaching is to help callers to speak more effectively with their veteran loved one about initiating mental health treatment.

Callers are made aware of CIC through a multifaceted public awareness campaign, including traditional advertisements (e.g., television and radio) and a social media campaign. Additional outreach strategies include networking with VHA components, such as the Veterans Crisis Line, the Caregiver Support Line, the National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and other mental health Centers of Excellence, and with veterans-focused nonprofit organizations outside the VHA. Although all these strategies have led to referrals, an evaluation conducted for incoming calls from October 2014 to June 2015 indicated that the predominant sources of referrals (N=939, 45%) were the Veterans Crisis Line or other VA staff members, such as Vet Center coordinators. There was an increase from an initially low number of calls in 2011 to a stable, higher rate since 2014 (Table 1). In the evaluation, we found that most of the callers to CIC were female (N=1,449, 75%), and most were spouses and/or intimate others (N=676, 35%), parents (N=413, 21%), or other family members and friends. Callers most commonly called about an Army veteran. Additionally, most of the callers were concerned about a veteran of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan (N=896, 58% of those callers reporting the veteran’s service era), whereas 14% (N=218) of the callers cited concerns about a Vietnam War veteran. The other service eras were each represented at percentages under 10%. When asked about their experience with the service, most callers (N=1,844, 79%) reported that they received the information or help they were hoping for.

TABLE 1. Call volume of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Coaching Into Care program, 2011–2019a

Call type201120122013201420152016201720182019Total
Incoming 6901,9122,8623,3152,6962,8763,7233,1463,38224,602
Follow-up 3758081,4322,1482,7362,8713,2912,3452,06518,071
Coaching 5331,1031,3901,8421,9301,8871,9151,3501,65613,606

aCoaching calls are focused on changing the caller’s behavior. Follow-up calls address scheduling, referrals, resources sent, and the veteran’s mental health treatment status. From 2011 to 2019, the total number of calls (incoming, follow-up calls, and coaching) was 56,279.

TABLE 1. Call volume of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Coaching Into Care program, 2011–2019a

Enlarge table

During their initial call to CIC, callers are assessed and triaged to the appropriate level of response. Callers are provided educational resources about mental health problems from websites such as the VHA’s National Center for PTSD and from mental health organizations external to VHA as a way to reduce the stigma of mental health and to normalize help-seeking (10). When the caller reaches CIC on behalf of a veteran who needs and/or desires treatment, the caller is encouraged to use basic positive communication strategies to facilitate the discussion with the veteran. In most cases, the caller is provided clinical referrals within or outside VHA, depending on the preference of the caller and/or veteran. Routine follow-up calls with callers assess whether the caller judged the CIC intervention as successful, whether he or she reached the service to which he or she was referred, and whether the veteran subsequently attended a mental health appointment.

Callers are transitioned from the initial level of intervention to the higher-level coaching intervention to manage complex situations, with the particular goal of having the veteran initiate mental health care in cases where the veteran is reluctant to do so. The objectives of coaching are defined as empowering, motivating, educating, and increasing the caller’s listening and communication skills (6) with the goal of enhancing the veteran’s intrinsic motivation for care. The intervention draws from self-determination theory (11), which emphasizes humans’ underlying need for autonomy to maximize intrinsic motivation. Callers are encouraged to reduce their pressure on the veteran to seek care and to engage in more positive activities of interest to both. Callers are coached to listen for concerns expressed by the veteran, such as complaints about mood, anxiety, or the future (11, 12). Furthermore, callers are encouraged to use an “autonomy-supportive” style of communication, which means offering to help the veteran but stating that it is understood that the offer is subject to the veteran welcoming this assistance (11, 12). Coaching includes behavioral rehearsal to enhance the learning of these skills.

Because callers are at times resistant or ambivalent about changing their own behavior in order to have a more positive influence on the veteran, coaches use aspects of motivational interviewing, as developed by Miller and Rollnick (13), to encourage consideration of these changes. A problem-solving approach (14) is used to address logistical and access barriers associated with seeking care (3, 4). Referrals for veterans’, callers’, and other family members’ treatment outside the VHA system are provided by using a national database of resources developed by CIC. Coaches tailor call frequency and length to the needs of the callers; a typical course of coaching lasts approximately 3 to 6 months.

In evaluating the program, we selected and reviewed the records of 165 callers who started working with a coach in October, November, or December 2014 or in January 2015 to determine the focus and outcomes of the coaching sessions through up to 6 months of coaching. Most callers (N=146, 89%) defined one or several goals related to encouraging initiation of mental health treatment for their veteran loved one, overcoming logistical barriers to the veteran’s treatment described by the caller, and/or wanting the veteran to improve his or her functioning. At the initial call to CIC, only 31% (N=51) of veterans were reported to be participating in mental health care of any kind. During the 6-month evaluation, we found that callers participated in a mean±SD of 3.49±2.77 coaching calls lasting 33.2±8.8 minutes. By the end of the 6-month review, 48% (N=79) of veterans were reported to have attended a mental health care visit, representing a statistically significant increase over the baseline rate (McNemar’s test, χ2=28.0, p<0.001).

CIC Challenges

Calls to CIC have been more complex than originally anticipated and have included helping veterans access additional mental health treatment services, addressing intimate partner violence, and addressing general concerns about the independent functioning of a veteran with or without a mental health condition. Thus, although the primary mission of CIC is to support veterans’ initiation of mental health treatment, the coaching must be flexible and tailored to each caller. We have coordinated with other VA telephone-based services, most notably the Veterans Crisis Line for immediate crises and the VA’s Caregiver Support Line for caregiving services, to address needs that are not best met by CIC.

We made several program decisions early in the development of the service to ensure veterans’ privacy and autonomy about treatment-seeking. We direct our efforts toward encouraging the caller to be more supportive of the veteran when voicing concerns, which may benefit the relationship, but entering mental health treatment remains the veteran’s choice. Importantly, the CIC program does not access veterans’ records; if there is evidence of high risk (e.g., suicidality), we engage the Veterans Crisis Line to mitigate the risks and to access veteran records if needed.

Future Plans

CIC is an evolving service with ongoing activities to expand and evaluate the coaching model. We are now initiating a VA-funded randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether delivering additional online, learning system–based information alongside telephone-based coaching will produce higher rates of treatment initiation for veterans with PTSD symptoms compared with CIC’s standard coaching. The online information uses the approach of the empirically supported community reinforcement and family training model (7). Additional development of the coaching model may be necessary to encourage treatment for veterans with chronic and recurrent serious mental health issues, including psychotic disorders, substance abuse, and suicidality. Callers for veterans with these concerns have recurrent and long-term needs unmet by most treatment systems. Given the success of the service demonstrated thus far, CIC will continue to be a unique service that bolsters families’ abilities to engage their loved ones in mental health treatment, and it may serve as a model for community efforts with nonveteran families.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Philadelphia (Sayers, Hess); Durham VA Medical Center, and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Whitted, Straits-Tröster); VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Glynn). Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, M.D., and Kenneth Minkoff, M.D., are editors of this column.
Send correspondence to Dr. Sayers ().

Dr. Straits-Tröster passed away on September 6, 2019.

This study was supported by the Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center of Veteran’s Integrated Service Network 4, which is funded by VA. The Coaching Into Care program is funded by the VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention.

These findings do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of VA or the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia.

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

The authors thank Christina Babusci, B.A., and Kia Lester, B.A., for assembling the data set and examining staff members’ notes for outcomes.

References

1 Analysis of VA Health Care Utilization Among Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn Veterans, From 1st Qtr FY 2002 through 2nd Qtr FY 2015. Washington, DC, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Public Health, Post-Deployment Health Group, Epidemiology Program, 2015Google Scholar

2 VA National Suicide Data Report 2005–2018. Washington, DC, Department of Veterans Affairs, 2018Google Scholar

3 Sayer NA, Friedemann-Sanchez G, Spoont M, et al.: A qualitative study of determinants of PTSD treatment initiation in veterans. Psychiatry 2009; 72:238–255Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Kim PY, Thomas JL, Wilk JE, et al.: Stigma, barriers to care, and use of mental health services among active duty and National Guard soldiers after combat. Psychiatr Serv 2010; 61:582–588LinkGoogle Scholar

5 Shepherd-Banigan M, Smith VA, Maciejewski ML, et al.: The effect of support and training for family members on access to outpatient services for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res 2018; 45:550–564Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Hutchison AJ, Breckon JD: A review of telephone coaching services for people with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare 2011; 17:451–458Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Meyers RJ, Roozen HG, Smith JE: The community reinforcement approach: an update of the evidence. Alcohol Res Health 2011; 33:380–388MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Batten S, Drapalski L, Decker L, et al.: Veteran interest in family involvement in PTSD treatment. Psychol Serv 2009; 6:184–189Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Hershenberg R, Mavandadi S, Klaus JR, et al.: Veteran preferences for romantic partner involvement in depression treatment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2014; 36:757–759Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Whealin JM, Kuhn E, Pietrzak RH: Applying behavior change theory to technology promoting veteran mental health care seeking. Psychol Serv 2014; 11:486–494Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Ryan RM, Deci EL: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000; 55:68–78Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Williams GC, Minicucci DS, Kouides RW, et al.: Self-determination, smoking, diet and health. Health Educ Res 2002; 17:512–521Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Miller WR, Rollnick S: Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change, 3rd ed. New York, Guilford Press, 2013Google Scholar

14 Nezu AM, Nezu CM, D’Zurilla TJ: Problem-solving therapy; in Cognitive and Behavioral Theories in Clinical Practice. Edited by Kazantzis N, Reinecke MA, Freeman A. New York, Guilford Press, 2010Google Scholar