The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Abstract

Tobacco use results in numerous consequences for individuals with mental illnesses and other substance use disorders, yet it is not adequately addressed by behavioral health professionals, including psychiatrists. This column describes current inaction among behavioral health professionals and some possible reasons for it and recommends next steps. Psychiatrists should provide treatment for all patients with a co-occurring tobacco use disorder and provide leadership to change policies and practices in treatment centers. Psychiatrists can be vital leaders of the effort to reduce the toll of tobacco use among people with mental illnesses, addictions, or both. A national movement for addressing tobacco use in the behavioral health field can be galvanized if more psychiatrists participate.

Among people with mental illnesses, tobacco-related illness is the highest-ranking cause of death (1). Yet smoking by patients continues to be an afterthought for most psychiatrists and behavioral health professionals. Smoking rates among individuals with a mental illness or another addiction are two to three times higher than in the general population. People with mental illnesses represent about one-third of the estimated 51 million adult smokers in the United States (2).

Psychiatrists are ideally positioned to address tobacco use disorder among individuals with mental illnesses or substance use disorders, but there is little evidence to suggest that psychiatry as a profession participates in or contributes substantially to tobacco control activities, which include not only treatment but also larger issues of advocacy and public health. A recent major federal initiative focused on improving the health status of patients with serious mental illnesses through primary and behavioral health care integration demonstrated improvements on some health measures, but tobacco use outcomes did not improve (3). This finding demonstrates that tobacco use continues to be a low-priority issue. This column reviews compelling reasons for psychiatrists to treat tobacco use disorder and addresses three main questions. Why aren’t the overwhelming consequences of tobacco use driving more psychiatrists to action? What can be done to remedy this situation? How can psychiatrists’ contributions be most effective?

Reasons to treat tobacco use

Tobacco use kills half of our patients

Smoking often leads to early death and disability among people with mental illnesses and substance use disorders. A recent large epidemiological study found that smoking accounted for half the deaths among persons with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or depression (1). Fortunately, quitting tobacco use improves life expectancy; quitting has a greater impact on cardiovascular risk than do changes in blood pressure, weight, physical activity, or lipids (4). Despite the powerful benefits of quitting, integrated efforts to address cardiovascular risk factors among people with serious mental illnesses have only cursorily included tobacco cessation efforts.

Tobacco use limits full recovery

As smoking becomes less common in the community, smokers experience greater barriers to community integration and will increasingly struggle to secure jobs and housing. Employers prefer to hire nonsmokers because of higher productivity and lower insurance costs. Landlords also prefer nonsmokers. A national movement is promoting smoke-free public housing that prohibits smoking even in one’s own apartment because of the toxic effects of secondhand smoke (5). Individuals with behavioral health conditions, like others with low incomes, suffer a high economic burden from tobacco use, spending about a third of their monthly disability income to purchase tobacco products (6).

Tobacco use disorder is in the DSM

Nicotine dependence (now tobacco use disorder) has been included in the DSM since 1980, yet it may be the only substance use disorder that is not routinely diagnosed and treated in mental health settings. Similar to other drugs of abuse, nicotine activates the brain reward pathways, causes release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, and fulfills criteria as a behavioral syndrome associated with distress or disability. Tobacco use disorder thus warrants formal diagnosis and treatment.

Tobacco use has a negative impact on treatment

The once popular notion that smoking stabilizes psychiatric illness is not supported by evidence. Rather, smokers go through cycles of uncomfortable withdrawal that are relieved by smoking, which may be misinterpreted as reduction of symptoms of mental illness. Nicotine withdrawal results in agitation, anxiety, restlessness, and impaired concentration that emerge hours after last tobacco use and are temporarily improved by smoking, giving the tobacco user with mental illness the false sense that smoking is calming and improves concentration. A study of smokers with schizophrenia in a psychiatric emergency department showed a significant reduction in agitation from the use of a nicotine patch (7). The reduction in agitation with nicotine replacement was similar to that seen with an antipsychotic medication. There is evidence that patients with mental illness experience more nicotine withdrawal symptoms than other smokers (8), underscoring the strong need for medication treatment both for cessation attempts and for periods of temporary abstinence.

Multiple studies show that smokers with mental illness who receive treatment for quitting remain psychiatrically stable. A recent meta-analysis showed that for smokers with and without psychiatric disorders, smoking cessation was associated with reduced depression, anxiety, and stress and improved mood and quality of life. The effect sizes of symptom improvement associated with quitting smoking were equal to or larger than those seen with antidepressant treatment for mood and anxiety disorders (9). Stopping smoking also does not have a negative impact on treatment for other addictions and may increase long-term abstinence (10). Studies have also found that smoking is an independent risk factor for suicidal thoughts, attempts, and completions (11).

Cigarette smoking is a potent P450 CYP1A2 enzyme inducer and reduces drug levels of many antipsychotics and antidepressants, including clozapine, olanzapine, and fluvoxamine. Smoking results in the need for higher medication doses, which may pose a risk of medication toxicity during a quit attempt.

Why aren’t psychiatrists acting?

Much of the work in tobacco cessation continues to be conducted in general medical systems and in primary care settings rather than in behavioral health settings. A recent review of nine community mental health sites showed that less than half of clinicians reported asking their patients about smoking (12). Psychiatrists counsel smokers about quitting less often than do other physicians, and behavioral health professionals overestimate the frequency with which they deliver treatment related to tobacco use (13). Inadequate training for psychiatrists likely impedes treatment of tobacco use disorder. In psychiatry residency training programs, education about treatment of tobacco use is not a requirement, and only half of programs provide it (14).

In addition, attitudinal barriers may impede the delivery of tobacco use treatment. Categorizing tobacco use as a health condition and not an addiction undermines progress and assumes that primary care should be the treatment setting. Behavioral health professionals underestimate the readiness of their patients to address tobacco use and cite low motivation as a barrier to intervening (12,13). Organizational leaders may not yet prioritize tobacco use treatment because of similar knowledge and attitude barriers.

Despite barriers, behavioral health providers are well suited to delivering intensive tobacco cessation treatments because they have experience and training in treating other addictions and expertise in behavioral therapies. Behavioral health providers, who regularly see patients with chronic mental health or addiction issues, have many opportunities to intervene with patients in regard to tobacco use, a chronic, relapsing condition, and have longer office visits in which to do so. Integrated models are successful for other co-occurring addictions and would likely succeed for tobacco use disorder as well. Providers may feel frustrated with smoking cessation services that they view as ineffective because success rates are less than 30%, although these rates are similar to those for other addictions, obesity, and other chronic diseases.

Historically, behavioral health services developed separately from general medical services, with different funding sources, leadership structures, and regulations. This separation of general medical and behavioral health services has carried over to tobacco control. Tobacco control refers to coordinated efforts to reduce tobacco-related diseases and deaths by promoting quitting, preventing initiation among youths, and eliminating exposure to secondhand smoke through educational, clinical, regulatory, economic, and social strategies. State or county tobacco control programs are typically housed in health departments, and unfortunately, in most states they are still disconnected from offices of mental health. Partnerships are essential for progress.

In addition, mental health systems have been slow to adopt tobacco-related policies (for example, tobacco-free clinic grounds) and requirements for clinical interventions. Barriers cited by psychiatrists include the need to address their patients’ more immediate issues, lack of motivation to quit among patients, and unfamiliarity with cessation interventions among behavioral health staff (13). Anecdotally, psychiatrists report concern that treating tobacco use represents a step toward the “slippery slope” of becoming a primary care physician, a move for which most feel unprepared. Program administrators may fear that tobacco-free grounds will reduce admissions and lower program census. Voluntary adoption of tobacco cessation treatments and policies does not seem to be effecting widespread change among behavioral health providers and programs. This suggests that mandatory policy interventions may be necessary.

How can psychiatrists contribute most effectively?

Provide treatment for all tobacco users

Clinical practice guidelines recommend interventions for all tobacco users, not just those expressing a desire to quit. For tobacco users not motivated to quit, motivational interventions should be provided. It is now time for full implementation of long-existing American Psychiatric Association guidelines recommending that psychiatrists treat tobacco use disorder among all their patients. Referrals to telephone quitline services may be appropriate for some.

Intervene during periods of temporary abstinence

All smokers should routinely have access to nicotine replacement therapy in treatment settings where acute abstinence occurs (such as emergency departments). These settings provide an opportunity to teach tobacco users about nicotine withdrawal and to motivate them to try or continue cessation treatments.

Provide and promote education

Tobacco training programs that are tailored to behavioral health settings are still rare. Extensive research in the past decade has led to advances in evidence-based practices for treating tobacco use. Psychiatry residency leaders can create standards for training to ensure that future generations continue this essential work.

Provide leadership to change treatment center policies

Now is the time to incorporate tobacco use treatment into behavioral health systems, as leaders and policy makers become more concerned about health disparities among people with mental illnesses. Policies should address both restricting tobacco in the environment and promoting assessment and treatment at all levels of care. Tobacco use treatment should be incorporated into substance use disorder policies.

Provide national leadership and advocate as physicians

Smokers with mental illnesses or substance use disorders deserve to be listed as a disparity group or priority population by national public health or tobacco control groups. Designation as a disparity group is needed to enhance funding and resources for tobacco use treatment. Because population approaches for reducing tobacco use may be less effective for these groups, a tailored, disparity-driven approach may be warranted. Psychiatrists must speak up within advocacy and professional organizations to focus on the need for tobacco control resources for this population.

Conclusions

A national movement for addressing tobacco use in behavioral health settings can be galvanized if more psychiatrists participate. As physician specialists in behavioral health and addictions, psychiatrists have great credibility that can be leveraged for tobacco control efforts. The strategies that have been effective in reducing the social desirability of tobacco and its use in communities need to be applied in the behavioral health system.

Many allies are essential for this effort: consumers and consumer-run organizations; families and family organizations; provider agencies; insurers; and federal, state, and local government groups. To undo the persisting link between smoking and mental illness, we must work together to disseminate education, develop local and national policies, and garner resources to ensure that every smoker who has a mental illness can access evidence-based treatments and to prevent smoking among young people with mental illnesses and substance use disorders.

Dr. Williams is with the Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers–Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey (e-mail: ). Dr. Stroup is with the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City. Dr. Brunette is with the Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire and the Bureau of Behavioral Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, New Hampshire. Dr. Raney is with Axis Health System, Durango, Colorado. Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., is editor of this column.

Acknowledgments and disclosures

Dr. Stroup participated in CME activities funded by Genentech. The other authors report no competing interests.

References

1 Callaghan RC, Veldhuizen S, Jeysingh T, et al.: Patterns of tobacco-related mortality among individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or depression. Journal of Psychiatric Research 48:102–110, 2014Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Lawrence D, Mitrou F, Zubrick SR: Smoking and mental illness: results from population surveys in Australia and the United States. BMC Public Health 9:285, 2009Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Scharf DM, Eberhart NK, Hackbarth NS, et al.: Evaluation of the SAMHSA Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration (PBHCI) Grant Program: Final Report. Santa Monica, Calif, RAND Corp, Dec 2013. Available at aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2013/PBHCIfr.shtmlGoogle Scholar

4 Hennekens CH: Increasing burden of cardiovascular disease: current knowledge and future directions for research on risk factors. Circulation 97:1095–1102, 1998Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 2012 Notices, Rules and Regulations. PIH-2012-25. Non-Smoking Policies in Public Housing. Washington, DC, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2012. Available at portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/public_indian_housing/publications/notices/2012Google Scholar

6 Steinberg ML, Williams JM, Ziedonis DM: Financial implications of cigarette smoking among individuals with schizophrenia. Tobacco Control 13:206, 2004Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Allen MH, Debanné M, Lazignac C, et al.: Effect of nicotine replacement therapy on agitation in smokers with schizophrenia: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. American Journal of Psychiatry 168:395–399, 2011LinkGoogle Scholar

8 Weinberger AH, Desai RA, McKee SA: Nicotine withdrawal in US smokers with current mood, anxiety, alcohol use, and substance use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 108:7–12, 2010Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Taylor G, McNeill A, Girling A, et al.: Change in mental health after smoking cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 348:g1151, 2014Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Prochaska JJ, Delucchi K, Hall SM: A meta-analysis of smoking cessation interventions with individuals in substance abuse treatment or recovery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 72:1144–1156, 2004Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Lucas M, O’Reilly EJ, Mirzaei F, et al.: Cigarette smoking and completed suicide: results from 3 prospective cohorts of American adults. Journal of Affective Disorders 151:1053–1058, 2013Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Himelhoch S, Riddle J, Goldman HH: Barriers to implementing evidence-based smoking cessation practices in nine community mental health sites. Psychiatric Services 65:75–80, 2014LinkGoogle Scholar

13 Williams JM, Miskimen T, Minsky S, et al.: Increasing tobacco dependence treatment through continuing education training for behavioral health professionals. Psychiatric Services (Epub ahead of print, Sept 15, 2014)Google Scholar

14 Prochaska JJ, Fromont SC, Louie AK, et al.: Training in tobacco treatments in psychiatry: a national survey of psychiatry residency training directors. Academic Psychiatry 30:372–378, 2006Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar