The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

The linear continuum of transitional residences: debunking the myth

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.150.7.1070

OBJECTIVE: After defining the transitional residence in the linear continuum of possible residential settings for recipients of psychiatric services, the authors address the question of whether this continuum functions as designed. Do persons with serious and persistent mental illness really enter the continuum in a more restrictive setting than that from which they emerge after a period of years and a number of transitions? METHOD: The authors surveyed all residential placements in western Massachusetts at one point in time in 1987 and again in 1991. The data included when a mentally ill individual entered a residential setting and what his or her prior setting was. Further, in 1991 the authors collected data on where the subjects of the 1987 study were currently living. RESULTS: In both the 1987 and the 1991 studies, 70%-75% of all beds were occupied by persons who had come directly from the state hospital, and only 5%-6% of beds were occupied by persons who had moved from a more restrictive to a less restrictive setting. In 1991 49.1% of the 1987 study subjects were in programs with the same level of restrictiveness, 7.9% were in less restrictive residential programs, and 31.8% were in less restrictive settings that included independent living. CONCLUSIONS: The transitional residence in the linear continuum does not function as designed for the majority of patients discharged into this system of care. It is premature to abandon it totally, however; it should become part of a set of community residential alternatives rather than be the only community residential option.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.