High users of outpatient mental health services, II: Implications for practice and policy
Abstract
Four assumptions underlie the stereotyped view of use of outpatient mental health services: 1) all use is alike, 2) any use leads to high use, 3) all high use is discretionary, and 4) insurance encourages excessive use. The authors refute the first three assumptions and suggest that different types of treatment episodes vary in their responsiveness to price. Diagnosis appears to be a poor indicator of inpatient needs; some coverage limits outpatient benefits according to type of treatment. The authors favor a combination of pricing strategies, as well as case management and clinical review for high users, which would not impede initial treatment but would limit excessive use of mental health services.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
