Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Szeftel, R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Szeftel, R.
Psychiatr Serv 50:267, February 1999
© 1999 American Psychiatric Association


Letter

Defending Telepsychiatry

Roxy Szeftel, M.D.

To the Editor: I disagree with the pessimism expressed by Werner and Anderson in their article on telepsychiatry in the October 1998 issue. We began developing telemedicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles several years ago and are running a very successful and financially viable program. Several things differentiate our program from the one reported on:

•We provide a very specialized consultation, psychiatric evaluation of individuals with severe developmental disabilities. We do not see general psychiatric patients.

•We function as consultants, not as primary care providers. Our patients are followed up by local nonpsychiatrist physicians.

•Because of the number of people involved at both the Cedars-Sinai site and the local telesite, we use the consultations as an educational opportunity for the local treatment team as well as for our residents.

•Each clinic session is two hours long. Most relevant information is sent from the local site by priority mail beforehand, at $3 a package. Progress notes are faxed immediately. In follow-up visits, a group home progress note is provided before the session so time can be used maximally.

•We use a 32-inch screen TV, which permits an excellent direct evaluation and mental status examination.

•During the sessions, the patients at the local site are placed next to ancillary staff who know them well, facilitating optimum direct evaluation.

I do agree that general psychiatric direct care may not be feasible and that telepsychiatry may best be reserved for subspecialty consultation and education.

Footnotes

Dr. Szeftel is director of child and adolescent psychiatry and director of the child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship training program at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.





This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Szeftel, R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Szeftel, R.


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1999 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org