Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 60:908-913, July 2009
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.7.908
© 2009 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
* Articles by McCrone, P.
* Articles by King, M.
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by McCrone, P.
* Articles by King, M.
Related Collections
* Costs, Cost Analysis
*Related Article

Article

The REACT Study: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Assertive Community Treatment in North London

Paul McCrone, Ph.D., Helen Killaspy, M.R.C.Psych., Ph.D., Paul Bebbington, Ph.D., F.R.C.P., Sonia Johnson, M.Sc., M.R.C.Psych., Fiona Nolan, R.M.N., B.A., Stephen Pilling, M.Sc., C.Psychol. and Michael King, Ph.D., F.R.C.P.

Dr. McCrone is affiliated with the Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London, PO24 Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF United Kingdom (e-mail: paul.mccrone{at}kcl.ac.uk). All other authors are with University College London.

OBJECTIVE: Assertive community treatment (ACT) is a key component of mental health care, but recent information on its cost-effectiveness is limited. This article provides a cost-effectiveness analysis of assertive community treatment and usual care from community mental health teams (CMHTs) in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Participants who had difficulties engaging with community services were randomly assigned to ACT (N=127) or continued usual care from CMHTs (N= 124). Costs were measured at baseline and 18 months later and compared between the two groups. In the analysis, cost data were linked to information on satisfaction, which had been shown to be significantly higher with ACT. RESULTS: Total follow-up costs over 18 months were higher for the ACT group by £4,031 ($6,369), but this was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval of -£2,592 to £10,690 [-$4,095 to $16,890]). A one-unit improvement in satisfaction was associated with extra costs in the ACT group of £473 ($747). CONCLUSIONS: The costs of ACT were not significantly different from usual care. ACT did, however, result in greater levels of client satisfaction and engagement with services and as such may be the preferred community treatment option for patients with long-term serious mental health problems.


Related Article:

July 2009: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2009 60: 877. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
A. G. Awad and L. N. P. Voruganti
Satisfaction as an Outcome Measure
Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 2009; 60(11): 1558 - 1559.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org